pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: pcplantdb
List archive
Re: [pcplantdb] Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata
- From: Stephanie Gerson <sgerson@stanfordalumni.org>
- To: Permaculture Plant Database <pcplantdb@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [pcplantdb] Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata
- Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2005 22:37:58 -0800
What are others visions of relationships? As in,
what are they going to look like? A word and list(s)? A comment
(plus lists)?
ANOTHER TOPIC THAT WOULD BE GREAT FOR PIW. SHALL WE FORWARD IT OVER?
PERHAPS WE COULD STORE THE RELATIONSHIP AS A WORD (FOR TAXONOMICAL PURPOSES)
BUT THEN EMBELLISH IT WITH MORE INFORMATION WHEN USERS 'CLICK' ON A STRAND IN
THE WEB (OR WHATEVER THEY DO TO RETRIEVE INFORMATION ABOUT A RELATIONSHIP.
MORE INFORMATION COULD INCLUDE CASE STUDIES, TESTIMONIALS FROM PEOPLE WHO HAVE
EXPERIMENTED WITH THIS RELATIONSHIP, IMAGES, WIKI-STYLE COMMENTS... THE WORD
COULD BE A CHARACTERIZATION OF THE RELATIONSHIP - MUTUALLY SYMBIOTIC,
PARASITIC, PREDATOR-PREY, COMPETITIVE, ETC.
IS THIS WHAT YOU'RE ASKING? AND WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY A WORD AND LISTS/COMMENT
PLUS LISTS?
SORRY, BUT THIS ASPECT OF THE PROJECT FASCINATES ME AND I'D LIKE TO UNDERSTAND
BETTER.
THANKS
*s
+++++++++++++++
Stephanie Gerson
sgerson@stanfordalumni.org
(c) 415.871.5683
____________________________________________________________________
- Re: [pcplantdb] Folksonomies - Cooperative Classification and Communication Through Shared Metadata, Stephanie Gerson, 01/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.