pchealth@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Permaculturist Health
List archive
- From: "Lawrence F. London, Jr." <lflj@bellsouth.net>
- To: Permaculturist Health <pchealth@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [pchealth] Fwd: [SANET-MG] Arsenic in rice
- Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2012 14:00:12 -0500
http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/magazine/2012/11/arsenic-in-your-food/index.htm
- White rice grown in Arkansas, Louisiana, Missouri, and Texas, which
account for 76 percent of domestic rice, generally had higher levels of
total arsenic and inorganic arsenic in our tests than rice samples from
elsewhere.
- Within any single brand of rice we tested, the average total and inorganic arsenic levels were always higher for brown rice than for white.
- People who ate rice had arsenic levels that were 44 percent greater than those who had not, according to our analysis of federal health data. And certain ethnic groups were more highly affected, including Mexicans, other Hispanics, and a broad category that includes Asians.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [SANET-MG] Arsenic in rice
From: Kathryn Marsh
As I understand it the problem in the USA is particularly bad because the arsenic levels in insecticides used on cotton were so high that they damaged the following rice crop, so varieties were bred that can withstand high levels of arsenic in the soil. I've now found that Italian rice is also very high in arsenic - in this case it is because of high levels in rocks. Which is also the problems in Bangladesh where the new artesian wells dug by the UN to end the huge infant mortality caused by contaminated surface run off have turned out to be as toxic in heavy metals as the shallow ones were in pathogens. Its a nightmare. In fact the brands of rice I mostly buy are from low arsenic areas in Northern India and pretty safe. Most Indian basmati is from these safe areas. Most Chinese rice is also safe because the Chinese spotted the problem a long time ago and have been applying strict controls because they were losing too many useful citizens. It isn't arsenic free but the levels should be much safer than American, Bangladeshi, or Italian. I find the last very distressing because although basmati would be our day to day rice we tend to have several different varieties of risotto rice in the house at any given time - we are risotto obsessives. I've also got Spanish valencia, for paella, in the cupboard, which has intermediate levels, and Camargue red, which is another bad one. I'm not going to throw them away, but I won't replace. The studies seem very clear that cooking in double the normal amount of water and throwing the excess waater away cuts the level by up to half, so I guess that us going to be the way to go in the future. But obviously it doesn't work for the aforementioned risotto or paella or for any of the other methods where the liquid is completely absorbed. Oh, and I see that Vietnam and Taiwan tend to have particularly high levels as well.
Wheat is simply grown on different soils and, as you suggest, with different irrigation, so there has never been a need to breed it for arsenic resistance
- [pchealth] Fwd: [SANET-MG] Arsenic in rice, Lawrence F. London, Jr., 12/07/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.