notify-dpml AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: DPML Notify
List archive
- From: Niclas Hedhman <niclas AT hedhman.org>
- To: Notify <notify-dpml AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: svn commit: r1254 - development/main
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2004 21:59:44 +0800
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 18:48, mcconnell AT netcompartner.com wrote:
> +#dpml.proxy.host=myproxy.company.com
> +#dpml.proxy.port=8080
> +#dpml.proxy.user=myusername
> +#dpml.proxy.password=mypassword
This is maybe the way we should go.
The point I have made earlier is that I wonder if it is a Transit concern at
all. It should be OS or perhaps JVM to worry about it.
Now, as it is *today* the code in Transit is also incorrect;
// String username = getProperty( props, PROXY_USERNAME_KEY );
// String password = getProperty( props, PROXY_PASSWORD_KEY );
Properties system = System.getProperties();
system.put( "proxySet", "true" );
system.put( "proxyHost", proxy );
system.put( "proxyPort", "" + port );
That is ANT property names, not the ones used by the JDK classes.
Cheers
Niclas
--
+------//-------------------+
/ http://www.dpml.net /
/ http://niclas.hedhman.org /
+------//-------------------+
-
svn commit: r1254 - development/main,
mcconnell, 12/22/2004
- Re: svn commit: r1254 - development/main, Niclas Hedhman, 12/22/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.