Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

nafex - Re: [NAFEX] anecdotal evidence

nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Thomas Olenio" <tolenio@sentex.net>
  • To: "'North American Fruit Explorers'" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [NAFEX] anecdotal evidence
  • Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 12:55:46 -0400

Hi,

My point was that you assumed it was your cellular telephone. There are
about 1,000 other environmental factors that could have caused your bee
attack. Causes ranging from barometric pressure, to temperature change, to
a bee returning from a distance that was agitated by a remote cause that
perceived you as a threat to the hive.

If I was to state that bread causes death, because all people who eat bread
eventually die I would be all wet. Sure people eat bread, and sure people
die, but there is no direct linkage.

If cell phones caused bee attacks, imagine the tsunami of unprovoked bee
attacks that would have already occurred in the past ten years. We would
already be aware of the relationship due to the sheer number of cell phones
out there.

Tom



-----Original Message-----
From: nafex-bounces@lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:nafex-bounces@lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Terry Bradshaw
Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 12:13 PM
To: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Re: [NAFEX] anecdotal evidence

I never suggested that this was evidence that cell phones kill bees, and
frankly doubt that story myself. I just piped in that my phone really
ticked them off.

TB

>Message: 3
>Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 08:21:25 -0400
>From: "Thomas Olenio" <tolenio@sentex.net>
>Subject: [NAFEX] Anecdotal evidence
>To: "'North American Fruit Explorers'" <nafex@lists.ibiblio.org>
>Message-ID: <000501c780ea$eb396be0$3e8b0740@userd5c77564e4>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
>Definition
>
>Anecdotal evidence: Anecdotal evidence is unreliable evidence based on
>personal experience that has not been empirically tested, and which is
often
>used in an argument as if it had been scientifically or statistically
>proven. The person using anecdotal evidence may or may not be aware of the
>fact that, by doing so, they are generalizing.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Sent: Tuesday, April 17, 2007 8:05 AM
>To: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
>Subject: Re: [NAFEX] Bee shortage hypothesis
>
>I was once planting a research block in a grower orchard during bloom.
>Went by the hives numerous times with no problems. Then my phone rang
>and I was swarmed and stung multiple times. It wasn't the sound of the
>ringing because the phone rang well away from the hive, but when I got
>within 50 feet of it with a call going, they attacked.
>
>Food for thought.
>

--
================
Terence Bradshaw
Calais, VT 1450 feet, zone 4

http://www.lostmeadowvt.com

_______________________________________________
nafex mailing list
nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Reproduction of list messages or archives is not allowed.
This includes distribution on other email lists or reproduction on web
sites.
Permission to reproduce is NEVER granted, so don't claim you have
permission!

**YOU MUST BE SUBSCRIBED TO POST!**
Posts from email addresses that are not subscribed are discarded.
No exceptions.
----
To subscribe or unsubscribe, go to the bottom of this page (also can be used
to change other email options):
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/nafex

File attachments are NOT stripped by this list.
TAKE STEPS TO PROTECT YOURSELF FROM COMPUTER VIRUSES!
Please do not send binary files.
Use plain text ONLY in emails!

NAFEX web site: http://www.nafex.org/





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page