Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

nafex - [NAFEX] "Bangor" Blackberry update

nafex@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Heron Breen <breen@fedcoseeds.com>
  • To: nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [NAFEX] "Bangor" Blackberry update
  • Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:54:23 -0500


Hi All,
I went and tasted the fruits of the "Bangor" blackberry I wrote about a few
months
ago (see past threads) and it is delicious. Very mild and perfumy sweet. Even
the
black but not full ripe ones have no sourness to them. Thumb-tip joint size
to
middle-finger joint tip size. Knowing that these are indeed the heirloom
blackberries in question due to its current keeper having recieved the plants
from
the originator's cousin 60 or so years ago now brings an interesting
contradiction:
U P Hedrick trialed and rated "Bangor" in "The Small Fruits of NY", I
believe, and
rated as small and insipid. This berry is neither. Three possibilities are
1- The berry observed by Hedrick was not true to name.
2- The berry observed by Hedrick was affected by a warmer climate
3- The berry observed by Hedrick was mixed up with another one when
collecting and
reviewing data.

This leads me to ask whether we should be trusting older sources any more
than we
trust newer sources of reference. Newer soures of reference can be just as
unclear
or wrong, even with color pictures. (Recently this was proven true in my life
with
an attempt to identify the leaf type of Valerian, different books
illustrating and
picturing both palmate and pinnate.) Just because some older book says a
certain
fruit variety is awful does not mean it should be ruled out? Maybe we are
using
these 'histories' as guides, but I would have been a fool to ignore this
blackberry
on Hedrick's opinion.
What do you all think?
Heron Breen
zone 4, Maine






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page