nafex@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: North American Fruit Explorers mailing list at ibiblio
List archive
- From: "Gianni" <GIANNI-2@prodigy.net>
- To: <nafex@egroups.com>
- Subject: Re: [nafex] Spamming
- Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 19:09:32 -0500
Title: Spamming
Dear Lon & group,
The Dr. has been warned, and granted there may be cultural
differences which I have defended him for
in the past, he has offers in other eGroups as well. And I can
agree after your friends thoughtful reply
that reconsideration of this may be warranted.
Although, as Richard Bell and Donna Hudson have clearly
pointed out in the past, the distinct probability
of introducing menacing virus's or pathogen's, disease or even
pest's through importation of stocks that
have not gone through phytosanitary or post entry quarantine
certification is something that deems
necessary consideration.
Realizing that the Dr. does indeed have
something to offer in the way of introduction of varietal specie
that may be cold hardy or valuable for
introduction to any grower that has yet to be exploited still,
needs consideration to the proper necessary permitting.
We as a venture explorer fruit based group have a marvelous
opportunity here to help him to help
ourselves and help with the proper channeling for introduction
as he has asked me this in the past
and frankly didn't know how to help him.
I think and believe he sincerely wants to merely introduce
excellent quality specimens to
any grower that has enthusiasm for
varieties that happen to be indigenous to India that by
chance may proliferate in colder areas of
our country. A little guidance is all I can perceive here.
I did ask that we could possibly help him before and for some
reason it went by the boards.
With the current political polarity climate, why cant we show
Dr. Parmar that Americans and
Canadians not only have a great ability in ingenuity but also
a great deal of compassion and
guidance for anyone in that they are only
trying to help themselves & their country?
And it turn, does that not help
us?
There is a cultural difference here and in the spirit of good
fellowship I think the Dr. is now fully
aware the he has foibled and will not
solicit the list.
Thanks to Greg's gracious explanation of the correct
intricacies of spamming or even borderline
solicitation, we are now all a lot more fully aware of when or
where, not to step. Thank you for the
quick and rapid response Greg.
As far as a NAFEX-2 list for ads, my suspicion would be that
the only folks that would frequent
that list may only be advertisers. As you know KFB, anyone can
be their own moderator at
eGoups and is welcome to open or start any list and I don't
think anyone here would say you
were soliciting if you were to ask members to come
join?
We not only have a tremendously wonderful treasure in that the
group mind here is astounding in
the wealth of knowledge available at a mere behest, but as
this group has an equal ability to
slough off minor inconsistencies through brevity and knowledge
as evidenced by the responses
to the spam encumbering thread.
A delightful holiday to all.
Hope your home team won!
Best wishes,
Gianni
|
-
[nafex] Spamming,
Lon J. Rombough, 11/23/2000
- Re: [nafex] Spamming, Gianni, 11/23/2000
-
Re: [nafex] Spamming,
Ginda Fisher, 11/24/2000
- Re: [nafex] Spamming, Tom Olenio, 11/24/2000
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [nafex] Spamming, Bruce & Joyce, 11/23/2000
- Re: [nafex] Spamming, Bruce & Joyce, 11/24/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.