market-farming AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Market Farming
List archive
- From: Allan Balliett <aballiett AT frontiernet.net>
- To: lists AT rhomestead.com, Market Farming <market-farming AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Market-farming] Interns vs employees
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:44:23 -0500
IN West Virginia, there are no employer cost savings in having an intern over a worker, unless you are 'blessed' with interns who are not receiving compensation on some level. We have all the expenses with interns that we have with local hourly help. Anyone who is not experienced on a farm can be a drain to productivity. I would like to have, but cannot find, professional farm workers. Next to that, I'll take interns. They fulfill my biological drive to teach my sons (and daughters) how to farm. _Allan
Realizing it may vary somewhat from state to state, would someone please
outline the benefits of having interns rather than employees, as it relates
to reporting, insurance, etc. I realize that hopefully interns are more
motivated. I am asking about requirements for unemployment, workman's comp,
paying social security, having an E.I.N. or not (I don't yet), etc.
Thank you.
Beth Spaugh
Rehoboth Homestead
Peru NY
http://rhomestead.com
_______________________________________________
Market-farming mailing list
Market-farming AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/market-farming
-
[Market-farming] Interns vs employees,
Beth Spaugh, 01/16/2007
-
Re: [Market-farming] Interns vs employees,
Allan Balliett, 01/16/2007
- Re: [Market-farming] Interns vs employees, Wiediger, Alison, 01/17/2007
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [Market-farming] Interns vs Employees, sora, 01/17/2007
-
Re: [Market-farming] Interns vs employees,
Allan Balliett, 01/16/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.