livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing
List archive
Re: [Livingontheland] Stanford Organic food study...
- From: Dan Conine <dconine@bertramwireless.com>
- To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Stanford Organic food study...
- Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 12:14:17 -0500
Benbrook's thoughts are a great and cogent response to the original
study. Too bad it's more detail and science than the average
American will spend any effort on. Here's another take on the study and its authors: Busted: Co-Author of Flawed Stanford Organic Study Has Deep Ties to Big Tobacco’s Anti-Science Propaganda http://naturalsociety.com/stanford-organic-study-big-tobaccos-anti-science-propaganda/
Dan C. WI---------------------------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ Message: 2 Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:18:06 -0600 From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net> Subject: [Livingontheland] Are Organic Foods Safer and Healthier To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org Message-ID: 201209061418060604.F5A9BE2B@mail.lobo.net"><201209061418060604.F5A9BE2B@mail.lobo.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Initial Reflections on the Annals of Internal Medicine Paper ?Are Organic Foods Safer and Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives? A Systematic Review? https://www.foodfirst.org/en/organic+vs+conventional+-+what%27s+missing paul tradingpost@lobo.net |
- Re: [Livingontheland] Stanford Organic food study..., Dan Conine, 09/09/2012
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.