Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - Re: [Livingontheland] Stanford Organic food study...

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Dan Conine <dconine@bertramwireless.com>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Stanford Organic food study...
  • Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 12:14:17 -0500

Benbrook's thoughts are a great and cogent response to the original study. Too bad it's more detail and science than the average American will spend any effort on.
Here's another take on the study and its authors:
Busted: Co-Author of Flawed Stanford Organic Study Has Deep Ties to Big Tobacco’s Anti-Science Propaganda


http://naturalsociety.com/stanford-organic-study-big-tobaccos-anti-science-propaganda/
Dan C.
WI 
----------------------------------------------------------------------


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 14:18:06 -0600
From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
Subject: [Livingontheland] Are Organic Foods Safer and Healthier
To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
Message-ID: 201209061418060604.F5A9BE2B@mail.lobo.net"><201209061418060604.F5A9BE2B@mail.lobo.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"


Initial Reflections on the Annals of Internal Medicine Paper ?Are Organic Foods Safer and Healthier Than Conventional Alternatives? A Systematic Review?
https://www.foodfirst.org/en/organic+vs+conventional+-+what%27s+missing

paul tradingpost@lobo.net




  • Re: [Livingontheland] Stanford Organic food study..., Dan Conine, 09/09/2012

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page