Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - [Livingontheland] Science says organic can feed the world & reduce CO2, GMOs don't raise yields, waste scarce water & fossil fuel inputs

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Livingontheland] Science says organic can feed the world & reduce CO2, GMOs don't raise yields, waste scarce water & fossil fuel inputs
  • Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:50:33 -0700


Science says organic can feed the world & reduce CO2, GMOs don't raise
yields, waste scarce water & fossil fuel inputs

Scientists Find Organic Agriculture Can Feed the World & More (excerpts)
ISIS Report 06/09/07
Comprehensive study gives the lie to claims that organic agriculture
cannot feed the world because it gives low yields and there is insufficient
organic fertilizer.
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/organicagriculturefeedtheworld.php
The average yields of organic and non-organic produce are about the same
in the developed world, but it is in the developing world - where most food
is needed and where farmers can least afford to pay for expensive synthetic
fertilizers and pesticides - that the major gains in organic agriculture are
most evident. Yield ratios of organic versus conventional range from about
1.6 to 4.0. The ratio averaged over all foodstuffs for the world is 1.3.
The implications of the University of Michigan study are far reaching. The
results imply that even with rather conservative estimates, no additional
land area is required to grow enough food to feed the world if we were to
switch to organic, and enough biologically available N can be obtained to
entirely replace the current use of synthetic N fertilizers.
There are substantial savings on carbon emissions and fossil fuels to
mitigate climate change simply from phasing out pesticides and synthetic
fertilizers, not to mention the extra carbon sequestered in organic soils.

No to GMOs, No to GM Science (excerpts)
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/NoToGMOs.php
Genetic engineering of plants and animals began in the mid 1970s under the
illusion that the genome – the totality of all the genetic material of a
species - is constant and static, and the characteristics of an organism is
hardwired in its genes. But geneticists soon discovered to their surprise
that the genome is dynamic and ‘fluid’, in that both the expression and
structure of genes are constantly changing under the influence of the
environment.
Thirty years of GMOs are more than enough
* No increase in yields; on the contrary GM soya decreased yields by up
to 20 percent compared with non-GM soya, and up to 100 percent failure of Bt
cotton in India
* No reduction in pesticides use; on the contrary, GM crops increase
pesticide use by 50 million pounds from 1996 to 2003 in the United States
* GM crops harm wildlife, as revealed by UK’s farm scale evaluations
* Bt resistance pests and Roundup tolerant superweeds render the two
major GM crop traits practically useless
* Vast areas of forests, pampas and cerrados lost to GM soya in Latin
America, 15 m hectares in Argentina alone, may worsen with the demand for
biofuels
* Epidemic of suicides in the cotton belt of India involving 100 000
farmers between 1993-2003, and a further 16 000 farmers a year have died since
* GM food and feed linked to deaths and sicknesses in the field and in
lab tests
* Roundup herbicide is lethal to frogs and toxic to human placental and
embryonic cells; Roundup is used in more than 80 percent of all GM crops
planted in the world
* Transgene contamination unavoidable, scientists find GM pollination of
non-GM crops and wild relatives 21 kilometres away [10]
And beware of GM bioenergy crops for producing biofuels. Biofuels are not
‘carbon neutral’ They compete directly with food for feedstock like maize,
soyabean, oilseed rape, sugarcane etc., sending food prices sky-high. They
also compete for land to grow them, causing large swathes of tropical
rainforests to be razed to the ground, replaced by plantations, and in the
process, sending extra tonnes of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere,
accelerating global warming [11] (Biofuels: Biodevastation, Hunger & False
Carbon Credits, SiS 33).
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/BiofuelsBiodevastationHunger.php

Scientists for a GM Free Europe, Final Announcement (excerpts)
Scientists from six countries join forces with MEPs to call for a Europe wide
and worldwide ban on growing GM crops.
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/GM_Free_Europe.php
The event coincides with key scientific publications [1,2] on how national
and international regulators have been ignoring damning evidence against the
safety of GM food and feed while colluding with industry to manipulate
scientific research to promote GM crops. The scientific papers will be
presented to the European Parliament together with a comprehensive dossier
containing more than 160 fully referenced articles from the Science in
Society archives documenting the serious hazards ignored, the scientific
fraud, the regulatory sham and violation of farmers' rights [3]
Time: 10:00-13:15 Date: 12 June 2007
Venue: Room P5B001, Paul Henri Spaak Building, European Parliament,
Brussels
Dr. Mae-Wan Ho , Director of ISIS: “ GMOs are not only hazardous for
health and bad for the environment, they will severely damage our chances of
surviving global warming. GM crops need more fossil fuels and water to grow,
both of which are fast diminishing."

Food Futures Now - *Organic *Sustainable *Fossil Fuel Free (excerpts)
How organic agriculture and localised food (and energy) systems can
potentially compensate for all greenhouse gas emissions due to human
activities and free us from fossil fuels
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/foodFutures.php
Highlights
* The largest single study in the world in Ethiopia shows composting
gives 30 percent more crop yields than chemical fertilizers
* Scientists, too, find organic out yields conventional agriculture by a
factor of 1.3, and green manure alone could provide all nitrogen needs
* Local farmers in Sahel defied the dire predictions of scientists and
policy-makers by greening the desert and creating a haven of trees
* Organic urban agriculture feeds Cuba without fossil fuels
* Organic agriculture and localised food systems mitigate 30 percent of
the world's greenhouse gas emissions and save one-sixth of energy consumption
* Anaerobic digestion of farm and food wastes in zero-emission food and
energy farms could boost total energy savings to 49.7 percent and greenhouse
gas savings to 54 percent
* Cleaner, safer environment, greater biodiversity, more nutritious
healthier foods
* Higher income and independence for farmers, more employment
opportunities
* Regenerate local economies, revitalize local, indigenous knowledge,
create social wealth.
Preface
Warming of the climate system is unequivocal, and it is accelerating, says
the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Report, released
17 November 2007. Eleven of the past twelve years are among the warmest since
records began. Sea levels are rising faster than predicted. Heavy rains,
droughts and heat waves are more frequent, and happening over larger areas of
the globe. Cyclone Sidr hit Bangladesh two days earlier leaving a death toll
of more than 10 000 and rising, a dramatic enactment of the “increase in
intense tropical cyclone activity.”
It will be much worse as the century progresses, IPCC predicts, and has
“very high confidence” that human activities are to blame, most of all, in
burning fossil fuels. The annual growth rate of CO2 in the atmosphere has
jumped from an average of 1.4 ppm a year since 1960 to 1.9 ppm over the past
ten years.
The good news is we can do a lot to mitigate global warming by reducing
greenhouse gas emissions. IPCC tells us that keeping CO2 levels down to the
most stringent levels will cost less than 0.16 percent of Global GDP a year
up to 2030. Surprisingly, however, IPPC has failed to mention organic
agriculture or sustainable food systems in mitigating climate change.

Biofuels: Biodevastation, Hunger & False Carbon Credits (excerpts)
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/BiofuelsBiodevastationHunger.php
A report published in 2002 by the CONCAWE group – the oil companies’
European association for environment, health and safety in refining and
distribution - estimated that if all 5.6 million hectares of set-asides in
the EU15 nations were intensively farmed for bioenergy crops, we could save
merely 1.3-1.5 percent of road transport emissions, or around 0.3 percent of
total emissions from those 15 countries [7]. These and other similarly
pessimistic estimates [8] are fuelling the growth in biofuels industries in
Third World countries, where, we are now told, there is plenty of “spare”
land for growing bioenergy crops. The sunshine is brighter all year round, so
crops grow faster, yield more and labour is cheap.
In the case of GM crops, however, we’re told there isn’t enough land, and
we need GM crops to boost yields to feed the world. GM crops have failed to
boost yields so far, and are overwhelmingly rejected worldwide, especially in
African countries where GM food and feed are being dumped as “food aid” [9].
Biotech companies are already promoting GM crops as bioenergy crops and
hoping for less regulation and more public acceptance, as they won’t be used
as food or feed. But that will leave our ecosystem and food crops wide open
to contamination by GM crops that are far from safe [10] (Making the World
GM-Free & Sustainable ).
http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Making-the-World-GM-Free-and-Sustainable.php







  • [Livingontheland] Science says organic can feed the world & reduce CO2, GMOs don't raise yields, waste scarce water & fossil fuel inputs, Tradingpost, 01/25/2011

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page