Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - [Livingontheland] Do We Have to Live Like Peasants to Be Truly Sustainable?

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Livingontheland] Do We Have to Live Like Peasants to Be Truly Sustainable?
  • Date: Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:03:28 -0700


Here's where the rubber meets the road. Agree? Disagree?

paul tradingpost@lobo.net
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Do We Have to Live Like Peasants to Be Truly Sustainable?
There has to be a happy medium between living as a poor peasant in an adobe
hut and living in a McMansion while driving a Hummer. But how do we find it?
January 4, 2011 |
http://www.alternet.org/environment/149391/do_we_have_to_live_like_peasants_to_be_truly_sustainable/?page=entire


In the San Diego suburb where I live, I don't quite fit in. I drive a Prius,
grow some of my own food and buy the rest at the farmers' market or the
co-op, and I don't own a TV. I can my own jams, pickles and tomato sauce,
make my own sauerkraut and yogurt, and collect what little rainfall we get in
a rain barrel. I am a vegetarian. I have four pet chickens who provide eggs
and fertilizer for my garden. If I could afford it, I would certainly install
solar panels on my house. Some call me a hippie or a treehugger. But several
recent trips to visit and live with families who are really sustainable have
given me pause. Can I live a sustainable life without giving up all of my
modern conveniences? Can any of us?

In Mexico's southernmost state, Chiapas, the students of the secondary school
of Roberto Barrios live in a way that is much closer to true sustainability.
(This school is run by the Zapatista rebels who proclaimed their autonomy
from Mexico in 1994.) Each morning, a team of students wakes up at 4:30am to
make breakfast from scratch: tortillas and beans from crops they grew
themselves, plus sweetened herbal tea and store-bought pasta. The students
cook over a fire built with firewood they chopped themselves. By 6:30am, the
other students wake up, ready to start their day. They get dressed, eat
breakfast, wash their dishes, and then start class at 7:30am. They are lucky
to have running water, but they do not have hot water. Nor do they have flush
toilets; instead, they have latrines with no seats. Fortunately, they have
electricity, but they have few electronic appliances beyond light bulbs, and
the electricity is not always reliable.

Midday, they break. Some students begin preparing the evening meal (more
beans and tortillas, with rice instead of pasta), and others sweep their
classroom. At 2pm, they migrate en masse to a river nearby, to swim, bathe
and do their laundry. This is one of the few moments in their day when they
inflict any harm on their environment, as their laundry detergent and bath
products likely contain surfactants, preservatives and fragrances that are
harmful to the environment. Along with a little bit of processed food and
soda, their detergent is one of the few store-bought products in their lives.
Here, there is no trash service, and anything that does not break down is
destined to remain as a pollutant indefinitely. Signs all over Chiapas warn
people not to litter, but really, there is nowhere for plastic to go. You can
burn it, releasing pollutants into the atmosphere, but there's really no way
to throw it "away."

The students live in dorms because they live too far away to commute home
every day. The roads in this part of Mexico range from poor to non-existent
(although the government has built many new roads since the Zapatista
insurrection in 1994), and most, if not all, of the students come from
families without cars. To go anywhere that is too far to walk, they must pay
for a bus or hitchhike.

The students' way of life, while remarkable particularly because they are as
young as 11 and so capable of taking care of themselves, is not terribly
unusual in Latin America. Peasants all over live in homes they or previous
generations built with wood or adobe and tin or thatched roofs, often with
dirt floors. Furniture is often homemade, and sometimes one sees homes that
are in disrepair. Adobe is environmentally friendly and a wonderful
insulator, but there are downsides to having a biodegradable home.

Agriculture is often organic simply because peasants cannot afford
store-bought seeds, fertilizer and pesticides. Attitudes in Latin America
toward organic food production range; some feel their own saved seeds and
traditional farming methods yield healthier, tastier and more natural food,
whereas others think their traditional ways make them backwards and they can
become modern by using store-bought inputs. What might look to an untrained
eye as a field of weeds may actually be a field of drying corn amidst various
wild edible and medicinal plants. Herbal medicine is often the norm, not
because the peasants are into "alternative medicine," but because it is all
they can afford or access. While I met young women who felt that herbal
medicine is less risky than pharmaceuticals, I also came across a man dying
of cancer who was terrified that he only had a three-day supply of morphine
and could not afford more.

This way of life brings extreme joy as well as extreme hardship. No swimming
pool in the U.S. can ever equal bathing in a river in the Mexican jungle
amidst waterfalls and butterflies, with the sound of howler monkeys in the
background. Nor is there any brand of beverage for sale that can equal the
fresh-pressed sugarcane juice with a squeeze of lemon I drank in the Amazon.
And I thought it was hilarious and delightful to find a Muscovy duck sitting
on her eggs in the room where I stayed in Chiapas. But as a creature of
21st-century America, committed to sustainability as I am, the prospect of
living entirely like a peasant is not at all appealing. Along with waterfalls
and sugarcane, there is also hard work, uncomfortable weather, and lack of
potable water, modern bathroom facilities, and much more.

Now, there's a happy medium somewhere between living as a poor peasant in an
adobe hut and living in a McMansion while driving a Hummer. But where is that
happy medium? Is my "sustainable" life in the U.S. just an illusion? Am I
merely a Whole Foods-shopping, yoga mat-toting, latte-drinking, Prius-driving
yuppie? I want to be sustainable, but I also don't want to give up my car,
laptop or the pharmaceuticals I take daily to prevent debilitating migraines.
Is that possible?

To answer these questions, one must be careful not to conflate poverty with
sustainability. That is, the peasant lifestyle is certainly sustainable, but
it is also shaped by extreme poverty. How would an equally sustainable life
look if one had the budget of a middle-class American? Currently the answer
is a life that is more difficult than it need be because our society imposes
many easily solved problems on those seeking sustainability. For example, in
many places in the U.S. it's difficult to give up one's car and to rely on
public transportation, biking and walking. And a robust rail system
(including high-speed rail) could easily reduce Americans' reliance on air
travel, which is perhaps the single most unsustainable way to travel. While
we know that it's possible to build up our public transportation
infrastructure and make more walkable and bikeable cities, we're a long way
from achieving that where most Americans live. In other words, asking what's
possible is not the same as asking what's possible now.

For anyone who takes sustainability seriously, the manmade roadblocks to
sustainable living in the U.S. are quite clear. The treehugger in you might
know a small home is more sustainable, but the smart investor in you knows
that buying a small house (or one lacking "necessities" like air conditioning
if you live in a hot climate) might make it harder to sell in the future.
Conventional cleaning products, building supplies, furniture, paints, food,
clothing, bath products, etc., might be unsustainable, but their sustainable
counterparts might be unaffordable. And while you might be able to spring for
small luxuries like a $5 bar of organic bath soap (or make your own), you
can't do the same for big-ticket items such as solar panels or the new
electric cars coming out.

One of the most famous examples of modern sustainable living is the Dervaes
family and their urban homestead in Pasadena, CA. The family of four, Jules
and his three grown children, Anais, Jordanne and Justin, grow over 6,000
pounds of produce annually in their tenth of an acre garden (enough to
provide for their own needs and sell to local consumers and restaurants).
They make their own cleaning products, bath products, candles, and biodiesel,
and they conserve energy and water using a number of methods, from
line-drying clothes to using a pedal-powered grain mill. And while they use
many "old" skills (like sewing and gardening), they don't give up their
connection to 21st-century technology (like solar panels and the Internet).

While the list of hand-powered devices on the Dervaes' family Web site looks
daunting, Jules feels it is worth it. He calls for a change in perspective,
saying, "Doing things manually almost always is slower than employing
machines. However, there are many factors to consider, including the hidden
and long-term costs, quality and durability." And even as a leader in
sustainability, he can point to places where he and his family are not
perfect. For example, they buy the most basic models of electronic gadgets
like cell phones and computers, using them when needed for business and
outreach, and going as long as possible between upgrades. However, they
cannot escape the trap of "planned obsolescence," in which cell phones and
computers are made -- and priced -- to be replaced by newer models in a few
years. Dervaes hopes to one day live in a community of like-minded people
where these electronic technologies are not needed.

Sustainability, at its core, means living in a way that can continue into
perpetuity, without exhausting natural resources like air, water, soil, and
biodiversity. And it seems inevitable that living a truly sustainable life is
not possible without giving up some conveniences, as the Dervaes family has
done. And, if we had to, most of us probably would not mind expending some
extra effort to go about our days -- putting on a sweater instead of flipping
on the heat, or buying secondhand clothes instead of new. A friend who bikes
several miles to work instead of driving tells me his bike rides are actually
the highlights of his day!

But in the long term, we might also find we have to give up things we do not
want to live without. What seems clear is that we need a societal effort to
work toward sustainability together, via more available public transportation
and bike trails, stricter regulation of the numerous toxic substances we
interact with daily (pesticides, flame retardants, phthalates, and more), and
policies to move us toward renewable sources of energy like solar and wind.
We can also encourage companies to make products that are intended to be
upgraded instead of discarded when newer technology is available. These
efforts will make sustainable living easier for all of us.






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page