Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - [Livingontheland] Local Food Advocates Hold Up Food Safety Bill In Senate

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Livingontheland] Local Food Advocates Hold Up Food Safety Bill In Senate
  • Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 09:43:00 -0700


Local Food Advocates Hold Up Food Safety Bill In Senate
MARY CLARE JALONICK | 11/17/10 03:04 AM
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/11/17/food-safety-bill-congress-senate-local-food-locavores_n_784744.html

WASHINGTON — A far-reaching food safety bill that could give the government
more power to prevent foodborne illnesses has become a target of advocates
for buying food produced locally.

They worry the legislation's safety requirements could force small farms out
of business.

The opposition of these "locavores" – advocates for buying food directly from
the farm or closer to home – and owners of small farms has become a sticking
point in the Senate, which was to vote Wednesday on whether to consider the
bill.

Supporters will need 60 votes to proceed on the bill because Sen. Tom Coburn,
R-Okla., has objected, saying the legislation's $1.4 billion cost isn't paid
for.

While the bill is designed to give the Food and Drug Administration greater
authority over the nation's food supply, opponents say it could bankrupt some
small farms that don't have the means to comply with new standards the bill
would impose.

Those standards could include registering food safety plans with the FDA and
documenting efforts to show food is not contaminated as it is produced.

"It's going to put a nail in the coffin of our family food producers," said
Sen. Jon Tester, D-Mont., who is planning an amendment to exempt some small
farms who market food close to their operations. He says many small farms
already comply with state and local regulations to keep food safe.

Food safety advocates are lobbying against the Tester amendment, saying his
concerns are overblown and efforts to broadly exempt smaller farms could be
misguided. They argue that the legislation, which would give the FDA more
authority to recall tainted products, increase inspections of food processors
and require producers to follow stricter standards for keeping food safe, is
crucial in the wake of outbreaks of contaminated peanuts, eggs and produce
that have sickened hundreds.

"Our view is that food should be safe no matter what the source is," said
Erik Olson, director of food and consumer product safety at the Pew Health
Group.

Olson and other advocates say that while small farms may not need to follow
as many regulations as large corporations, the size of the farm is not as
important as the safety of the food. Producers of leafy greens, tomatoes and
other foods that more frequently cause illness should have to follow strict
standards to keep contamination away from food no matter what the size of
their operation, they say.

The two sides were working toward a compromise Tuesday. If the Senate votes
to proceed, senators probably would then consider Tester's amendment as part
of floor debate on the bill.

Whether the bill could make it to the president's desk during the brief
lame-duck congressional session is unclear since the House passed a different
version of the legislation in 2009. Even if the Senate passes the bill, the
two pieces of legislation would have to be quickly reconciled before the end
of this session sometime after Thanksgiving.

President Barack Obama issued a statement in support of the Senate bill
Tuesday, saying the legislation would address "long-standing challenges" of
the FDA by helping producers prevent foodborne outbreaks and giving the
government more tools to keep food safe.

Recent outbreaks have exposed a lack of resources and authority at the FDA as
the embattled agency has struggled to contain and trace contaminated products.

Currently, the FDA does not have the authority to order a recall and must
negotiate recalls with the affected producers. The agency rarely inspects
many food facilities and farms, visiting some every decade or so and others
not at all.







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page