Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - [Livingontheland] Civilization's Cost: The Decline and Fall of Human Health

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Livingontheland] Civilization's Cost: The Decline and Fall of Human Health
  • Date: Sat, 23 May 2009 19:08:58 -0600


(To change your settings or unsubscribe please go to
http://lists.riseup.net/www/info/globalnetnews-summary)


Science 1 May 2009:
Vol. 324. no. 5927, p. 588
DOI: 10.1126/science.324_588a

American Association of Physical Anthropologists:
Civilization's Cost: The Decline and Fall of Human Health
Ann Gibbons
http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/summary/324/5927/588-a
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGISTS, 31 MARCH-4 APRIL 2009,
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS

When humans were freed from searching for food from dawn to dusk, they
finally had time to build cities, create art, and even muse about the gods.
Agriculture and cities made human life better, right? Wrong, say
archaeologists who presented stunning new evidence that most people's
health deteriorated over the past 3000 years. "We document a general
decline in health across Europe and the Mediterranean," says
bioarchaeologist Clark Spencer Larsen of Ohio State University in Columbus.
He's a coinvestigator of the European Global History of Health Project, an
ambitious new effort to study the health of Europeans during the past
10,000 years.

Most bioarchaeology studies tend to tell the tale of illness and death of
people from a single site, such as a burial pit for plague victims or an
ancient cemetery. Larsen's project is one of the first-and the largest-to
try to reveal broad trends by assembling standardized data from large
samples. In a series of posters, the team presented the first analysis of
data on 11,000 individuals who lived from 3000 years ago until 200 years
ago throughout Europe and the Mediterranean. "This is a real tour de
force," says bioarchaeologist George Armelagos of Emory University in
Atlanta, after reviewing the posters.

The project has taken 8 years and $1.2 million to organize so far. The goal
was to pool 72 researchers' data on standardized indicators of health from
skeletal remains, including stature, dental health, degenerative joint
disease, anemia, trauma, and the isotopic signatures of what they ate, says
project leader Richard Steckel of Ohio State. They also gathered data on
settlement size, latitude, and socioeconomic and subsistence patterns so
that they could compare rich and poor, urban and rural, farmers and
hunter-gatherers.

They found that the health of many Europeans began to worsen markedly about
3000 years ago, after agriculture became widely adopted in Europe and
during the rise of the Greek and Roman civilizations. They document
shrinking stature and growing numbers of skeletal lesions from leprosy and
tuberculosis, caused by living close to livestock and other humans in
settlements where waste accumulated. The numbers of dental hypoplasias and
cavities also increased as people switched to a grain-based diet with fewer
nutrients and more sugars.

The so-called Dark Ages were indeed grim for many people who suffered from
more cavities, tooth loss, rickets, scurvy, and bone infections than had
their ancestors living in hunter-gatherer cultures. People became shorter
over time, with males shrinking from an average of 173 centimeters in 400
B.C.E., for example, to 166 centimeters in the 17th century-a sure sign
that children who were not members of the elite were eating less nutritious
food or suffering from disease.

Why would people want to settle in towns or cities if it made them sick?
One answer is that settlers suffered less bone trauma than nomadic
hunter-gatherers, suggesting to Steckel that they might have felt safer in
villages and, later, towns where an emerging elite punished violent
behavior-but also controlled access to food.

The social and political inequities in urban centers meant that for
nonelites, moving into cities was "almost a death sentence" for centuries,
notes Armelagos. In the Middle Ages, people in the countryside were
generally taller than people in cities.

After a long, slow decline through the Middle Ages, health began to improve
in the mid-19th century. Stature increased, probably because of several
factors: The little Ice Age ended and food production rose, and better
trade networks, sanitation, and medicine developed, says Steckel. But take
heed: Overall health and stature in the United States has been declining
slightly since the 1950s, possibly because obese Americans eat a
poor-quality diet, not unlike early farmers whose diet was less diverse and
nutritious than that of hunter-gatherers. By understanding how disease and
malnutrition spread in the past, researchers hope to apply those lessons in
the future. "Our goal is to understand the health context for what we have
today," says Larsen.






  • [Livingontheland] Civilization's Cost: The Decline and Fall of Human Health, Tradingpost, 05/23/2009

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page