Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - [Livingontheland] Floods strip Midwest of tons of valuable topsoil

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@lobo.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Livingontheland] Floods strip Midwest of tons of valuable topsoil
  • Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:29:47 -0600


July 27, 2008 1:27 p.m. PT
Floods strip Midwest of tons of valuable topsoil
http://seattlepi.nwsource.com/national/1110ap_flooding_soil_erosion.html
By DEANNA MARTIN ASSOCIATED PRESS WRITER

MARTINSVILLE, Ind. -- Jim Lankford's corn crops used to stretch to the White
River. Now the river has stretched itself through his crops.

The river eroded a new route for itself during June's flooding, a channel
with steep 12-foot banks at the edge of some of Lankford's corn fields about
30 miles southwest of Indianapolis. The flood spread rocks in other spots,
making it look as if Lankford planted soybeans in a gravel road. Elsewhere,
silt is piled up like sand dunes and uprooted trees still litter cornfields
more than a month after the floods.

"It's the worst I've ever seen in my life for this area," the 62-year-old
farmer said.

The flooding that swamped large areas of the Midwest took with it some of the
region's most valuable resource: soil.

Now farmers and environmentalists are at odds over what to do with
erosion-prone land - take their chances planting crops on marginal land in
hopes of good yields and high grain prices, or plant trees, native grasses or
ground cover that act as a natural flood buffer.

The floods may have caused up to $3 billion in crop losses in Iowa and $800
million in crop damage in Indiana, according to estimates from agriculture
secretaries in those states.

Erosion damage is harder to tally.

In Wisconsin, flooding damaged about $2.8 million worth of conservation
structures, such as dams, levees, ditches and waterways, said Don Baloun, a
farm conservationist for the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Natural
Resource Conservation Service in Madison, Wis.

Some land in Illinois is still submerged.

"It could be fall for some of our counties on the Mississippi River before we
see what kind of damage farmers did experience as far as erosion," said
Donald King of Illinois' USDA's Farm Service Agency.

Erosion robs farmers of the nutrient-rich topsoil their growing plants need.

"It takes thousands of years to form one inch of topsoil," said Jane
Hardisty, Indiana's state conservationist. "Within a day, we lost it. It's
just devastating."

It's also an issue downstream, where sediment diminishes water quality.
Scientists think the "dead zone" in the Gulf of Mexico - oxygen-depleted
water off the Texas-Louisiana coast that can't support kill marine life - is
likely to be worse this year partly because of the flood runoff.

States have set up programs to keep their soil. Missouri, for example, has
nearly halved its rate of soil loss since the mid-1980s, when it dedicated a
special tax that generates $42 million a year for soil-conserving practices
such as terraces, retention ponds and grazing rotations.

The conversion of row-crop land to pastures over the last 20 years in
northern Missouri also has helped conserve the precious few inches of top
soil left in that part of the state, said Bill Foster, who heads the state's
soil and water conservation program.

"If we lose very many more inches of soil, we won't be farming," Foster said.
"It's critical to keep in place."

The Farm Service Agency's Conservation Reserve Program also helps. The $2
billion-a-year federal program pays farmers not to plant crops, instead
returning land to its native state. That saves an estimated 450 million tons
of soil each year.

However, that program isn't without controversy. Environmental groups
recently sought a federal court injunction to stop hay production and cattle
grazing on some conservation land. A judge in Seattle ruled that the USDA did
not conduct an appropriate environmental review, but said a reversal would be
unfair to farmers and ranchers counting on using that land.

Conservation program officials announced earlier this month that farmers in
flooded-damaged areas of 16 states could graze livestock on conservation land
to help them cope with rising grain prices and flood damage.

"Our CRP land is vital to the balance we promote at USDA between production
and preservation," Agriculture Secretary Ed Schafer said. "I commit this
resource knowing that we must redouble our conservation effort at every
future opportunity."

One of the program's founders, Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., wants to also
allow farmers to plant crops on more stable conservation land.

Environmental groups say there are risks to opening up conservation program
land to planting. Marginal land planted with ground cover or trees acts as a
natural flood barrier, said Sara Hopper, director of agricultural policy for
the Environmental Defense Fund. Planting crops could mean less protection
against floods, she said.

"It's going to make a bad situation worse, particularly over the long run,"
she said.

Lankford, the Indiana farmer, faces a difficult decision for his
flood-damaged land.

He could replant corn in an effort to make money off the field, but that
would take cash to rebuild a breached levee and haul hundreds of truck loads
of topsoil to replace his lost land. He could also consider the conservation
reserve program, or he could simply abandon the affected field.

Another big flood could come again next year, he said, or not for another
hundred years.

"Traditionally, farmers are optimists, and I know I'm that way. They always
think 'Well, next year will be better,'" Lankford said.

"You know there's risks. Sometimes it's worse than you think."





  • [Livingontheland] Floods strip Midwest of tons of valuable topsoil, Tradingpost, 07/27/2008

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page