Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - Re: [Livingontheland] Farmer Percy Schmeiser settles contamination battle with Monsanto

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: su do <speakingbeareturns@yahoo.com>
  • To: Healthy soil and sustainable growing <livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] Farmer Percy Schmeiser settles contamination battle with Monsanto
  • Date: Wed, 26 Mar 2008 15:34:12 -0700 (PDT)

It's good to hear good news for once!
--- activism98201@verizon.net wrote:

> This is a big victory!
>
>
> -Mark Nagel
> Everett, WA
>
>
> Source:
>
http://www.naturalfoodsmerchandiser.com/asp/articleDisplay.asp?strArticleId=2804&strSite=NFMSite
>
> Farmer Percy Schmeiser settles contamination battle
> with Monsanto
> Vicky Uhland
>
>
> 3/25/2008 3:37:32 PM
>
>
> Canadian canola farmer Percy Schmeiser, who has
> battled biotech company Monsanto for a decade, last
> week settled a lawsuit that he said will allow
> farmers with fields contaminated by Monsanto's
> genetically modified seed to get "compensation
> without giving up their freedom of speech or their
> future rights to sue."
>
> Schmeiser, 77, has been involved in two lawsuits
> with Monsanto since 1998, after the company
> discovered its GM Roundup Ready canola seeds growing
> on Schmeiser's 1,400-acre Saskatchewan farm.
> Monsanto billed Schmeiser for unauthorized use of
> its seed, but Schmeiser claimed the seed drifted
> onto his fields from neighboring farms and passing
> trucks. In 2004, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled
> that Schmeiser violated Monsanto's patent by
> knowingly replanting and harvesting the GM seeds,
> but he didn't have to compensate Monsanto because
> his profits weren't affected by the Monsanto seeds.
>
> In 2005, Schmeiser said he discovered GM canola
> growing in a 50-acre fallow field he was using for
> mustard research. He notified Monsanto, which agreed
> to remove the plants through its "unexpected
> volunteer response program," provided he sign a
> standard release form. But Schmeiser balked at two
> provisions he said were in the form: a "gag order"
> that would prevent him from talking about the seed
> cleanup, and a prohibition against suing Monsanto
> for any future contamination of the field.
>
> "It said my wife, myself or any member of our family
> could never ever take Monsanto to court for the rest
> of our lives irregardless (sic) of how much they
> contaminated that field," Schmeiser said. "And we
> flatly refused to sign the gag order because we will
> never give our freedom of speech away to a
> corporation."
>
> Monsanto Canada spokeswoman Trish Jordan said the
> form is "standard business practice" and that none
> of the farmers who have requested similar GM seed
> cleanups from Monsanto have ever "expressed any
> concerns" with the form. She also said the form
> doesn't state that "the person [who signs it] cannot
> sue us in subsequent years."
>
> She provided a copy of the form, which reads: "The
> grower does hereby for himself and/or the
> corporation, his heirs, executors, partners, joint
> venturers, administrators, successors, affiliates,
> subsidiaries and assigns, release and forever
> discharge Monsanto Canada Inc., its affiliates,
> successors and assigns, and its officers, directors
> and employees, servants and agents (past, present
> and future) (hereinafter referred to as the
> "Releasees") from any and all actions, causes of
> action, suits, claims, demands and damages of
> whatever nature or kind for, upon or by reason of
> any damage or loss to person and/or property which
> has been or may be sustained in consequence of the
> purchase, use and or application of" whatever
> product Monsanto gives the farmer to get rid of the
> GM seeds or plants.
>
> Schmeiser paid $660 to have the GM plants removed
> from his fields and then sued Monsanto in small
> claims court for the sum. Jordan said at a court
> case-management conference in 2007, Monsanto offered
> to revise its release form to meet Schmeiser's
> approval, but he declined. Schmeiser disagrees.
> Monsanto "refused to revise the conditions [in the
> form], and the court records would prove that," he
> said.
>
> Schmeiser said he offered to settle the case a year
> later provided Monsanto write a new form that would
> allow him to discuss the case and sue Monsanto for
> any GM contamination of his field for any year other
> than 2005, when he discovered the contamination.
> Monsanto rewrote the form, and the case was settled
> March 19.
>
> "It's a major breakthrough for farmers, giving them
> back their freedom of speech and their right to
> sue," Schmeiser said. "After 10 years of fighting
> Monsanto, this is a good way to end it."
> _______________________________________________
> Livingontheland mailing list
> Livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
>
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/livingontheland
>




____________________________________________________________________________________
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page