Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - [Livingontheland] What's So Beautiful About Small

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "TradingPostPaul" <tradingpost@riseup.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Livingontheland] What's So Beautiful About Small
  • Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2007 09:30:07 -0700


What's So Beautiful About Small
by Peter Rossett
http://www.yesmagazine.org/article.asp?ID=353

Are small farms as bountiful as they are beautiful? Can they really compete
with large farms in the agriculture of the future? The answer is yes on
both counts. Here's why.

• Small farms are far more productive, producing from 200 to 1,000
percent more per acre than large farms. We are often misled by “yield”
figures. The highest yield of a single crop might be achieved by planting
it alone – in a monoculture. Large farms must plant monocultures because
they are easiest to manage with heavy machinery. But monocultures make
inefficient use of space. Small farmers often intercrop, using the empty
space between rows (which would otherwise produce weeds) to combine or
rotate crops and livestock, with manure replenishing soil fertility.
Instead of “yield,” which refers to one crop, we should include
everything the farm produces – crops, livestock, fruit, fish – when we
measure their productivity.

• Small farms are more efficient than large farms, say the few studies
that have actually compared them. When economists measure a farm’s use of
capital, land and labor, they find that large farms are very inefficient.

• Small farms promote regional economic development. In farming
communities dominated by large corporate farms, nearby towns die off.
Mechanization means fewer local jobs, and absentee ownership means that
settled farm families themselves are no longer to be found. In these
corporate-farm towns, the income earned in agriculture is drained off into
larger cities to support distant enterprises, while in towns surrounded by
family farms, the income circulates locally, generating more local
businesses, schools, parks, churches, clubs, and newspapers, along with
better services, higher employment, and more civic participation.

• Small farmers are better stewards of natural resources. The small farm
landscape is typically filled with biodiversity. The wood lot, the orchard,
the fish pond, the backyard garden, large and small livestock, and the farm
itself with its varied crops allow for the preservation of hundreds if not
thousands of wild and cultivated species. The commitment of family members
to long-term soil fertility on the family farm is not found on large farms
owned by absentee investors. In the US, small farms devote 17 percent of
their land to woodlands, compared to only 5 percent on large farms. Small
farms maintain nearly twice as much of their land in soil-improving uses,
including cover crops and green manures.

– Peter Rossett, Food First/Institute for Food and Development Policy

Adapted from “Small is Bountiful,” The Ecologist, December 1999; and
from Food First Policy Brief No. 4, “The Multiple Functions and Benefits
of Small Farm Agriculture in the Context of Global Trade Negotiations”
(www.foodfirst.org/media/press/1999/smfarmsp.html), both by Peter Rosset.






  • [Livingontheland] What's So Beautiful About Small, TradingPostPaul, 01/28/2007

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page