Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - Re: [Livingontheland] What Does It for Broccoli?

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "TradingPostPaul" <tradingpost@riseup.net>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Livingontheland] What Does It for Broccoli?
  • Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 08:54:06 -0600


Bob, here's some heavier material on humus and microorganisms from the
Northeast Organic Farming Association.
paul, tradingpost@riseup.net
---------------
The outstanding scientific discovery of the twentieth century is not
television, or radio, but rather the complexity of the land organism. Only
those who know the most about it can appreciate how little we know about it.
- Aldo Leopold in Round River, 1933
--------------

Humus: Still a Mystery
Paul Sachs
http://www.nofa.org/tnf/humus.php

Note: A glossary has been provided, at the end, to define the some of the
scientific terms used throughout this article.

Humus is like air in a sense. It is abundant, renewable and essential for life
to exist on this planet. However, humus is so much more complex than air that
even after hundreds of years of research, no one really knows exactly what it
is.

The term "Humus" doesn't really describe anything specific. Its like using the
word "dog" to describe a German Short Haired Pointer. Humus is sometimes
defined
as the end product from the decomposition of organic residues. But since it
never remains in a static condition, it is hard to refer to it as an end
product.

Furthermore, the composition of humus in one soil can be so structurally,
chemically and visibly different from humus in another soil that it is
difficult
to refer to them both as the same thing.

Over the years, a lot of information has been gathered about humus: Certain
components have been identified; the nature and properties are fairly well
known
and the factors that control its existence are pretty much accepted as common
knowledge. However, to date, an indisputably accurate method of extracting
humus
from soil has yet to be discovered which, in of itself, severely limits the
study of this material.

Attempts to define humus date back to the time of the Romans, but it wasn't
until 1761 when it was first linked to the decomposition of organic matter by
J.
G. Wallerius. Back then it was thought that plants were able to derive
nutrients directly from humus but in 1840, Justus von Liebig discovered that
plants can only assimilate soil nutrients in an inorganic form and that plant
food must be changed into mineral salts first. Liebig believed that this
occurred from chemical reactions in the soil. About 25 years later, attention
was called to the role of microorganisms in the mineralization of nutrients
from
humus. It was in the early 1900's that most of the significant research on
humus occurred. However, a lot of the information produced became somewhat
obsolete at the dawn of the chemo-agricultural age in the early 1940's.

Genesis

The formation of humus begins when organic residues of plants and animals come
in contact with microbial life in the soil. The carbon compounds contained in
the residues, that were synthesized by the plant or animal when it was alive,
are protein and energy for the various bacteria, fungi and actinomycetes
involved in the decay process.

Aerobic microorganisms are the most adept at decomposing organic matter. They
need an environment where there is an adequate amount of free oxygen to live
and
be active. The degree to which free oxygen exists in soil plays a major role
in
regulating the favorable or unfavorable conditions under which humus is
formed.
The same is true for moisture, soil temperature and the carbon to nitrogen
ratio of the residues being decomposed.

Where no free oxygen exists (e.g. in water), decomposition of organic matter
occurs by anaerobic organisms. This process is much slower than that conducted
by aerobic organisms but can, in the long run, produce a greater amount of
humus
(e.g. muck or organic soil). Humus formed under water is slightly different
than its aerobic counterpart due more to the nature of the residues from the
two
different environments than the process of aerobic vs. anaerobic
humification.
Most of the contributions of organic matter to organic soils are from water
dwelling insects and microbes that have a higher percentage of protein than
the
plant residues found in forests, fields, or gardens. Other components come
from
organic residues transported by wind and water currents to a location where
they
can accumulate and settle. Much of this translocated material may already be
humus. Higher percentages of humus are found in soils formed anaerobically
because conditions are more favorable for humus accumulation and less
favorable
for its destruction.

At the other extreme is an environment where there is too much oxygen. If
moisture and soil temperature are also at optimum levels, organic matter can
be
decomposed so quickly that no accumulation of humus will occur at all (e.g. in
tropical environments where high temperatures and moisture levels occur in
predominantly sandy soils that naturally contain plenty of air).

Soil temperature is another important controlling factor in the formation of
humus. As the temperature of a soil increases, there is a corresponding
increase
in microbial activity. Soils that exist in warmer regions of the earth tend
to
have lower native levels of humus than soils in colder areas. Figure 1 shows
that at a temperature of 88 degrees F, in well aerated soil, humus can no
longer
accumulate.

Microbial Processing

During humification of organic matter, microbes dismantle most of the sugars,
starches, proteins, cellulose and other carbon compounds to utilize them for
their own metabolism. The assimilation of these nutrients from the original
residues by microorganisms is the first stage in the process of creating
humus.
Some of the more easily dissolved components of the residues end up being
used
and re-used over and over, by many different varieties of organisms, and may
never actually become humus. However, they provide energy and protein for the
life cycles of the organisms involved in its synthesis. The more decay
resistant
components of the residues are not so much assimilated as they are altered by
microbial processing into humic substances.

Much of the nutrient and energy assimilated into the bodies of microbes is
re-used by other microbes when they die. Some is mineralized back into plant
food and some is changed into biologically resistant compounds that accumulate
as components of humus. As more and more members of the biomass club
participate
in the festivities of eating, dying and being eaten, the cycles of soil life
are implemented. Plants create organic matter which feeds soil organisms which
transform the nutrients from the residues back into plant food, nutrients for
other organisms and humus.

The digestion of organic matter in the soil is analogous to the digestive
system
in animals. Nutrients derived from food ingested by an animal are diffused
into
its body where they are utilized for energy and production of new cells.
By-products, such as urea, water, carbon dioxide and other simple compounds
are
given off. The undigested portion of the food is excreted as feces.

In the soil, organic matter is dissolved and absorbed by microorganisms
utilizing the nutrients and energy for their own metabolism. Their activities
convert most of the organically bound nutrients back into a mineral form which
is usable by plants and other microbes. The undigested portion of the residues
accumulate as humus. However, humus is not completely immune to decomposition.
Microbes will eventually recycle all the elements in humus back to where they
initially came from, even if it takes a millennium to do it.

Decay Resistance

Some of the components in organic residues are much more resistant to decay
than
others. Carbohydrates such as sugars and starches will decompose faster than
other carbohydrates such as cellulose and hemicellulose. Fats, waxes and
lignins
are the most resistant to decay of all the organic components. Proteins vary
in
decay resistance but are generally more resistant than sugars and starches
yet
more easily decomposed than all the other components.

Although many of these components exist in humus (in an altered form) (see
figure 2), the degree to which they exist in the organic residues plays a role
in the quantitative accumulation of humus. Materials that contain a high
percentage of easily decomposed components such as sugars, starches and
proteins
are, for the most part, assimilated back into the living biomass. Although
the
energy and protein provided by these residues help in the creation of humus,
the
ratio of the mass and weight of the residues to the measure of humus produced
is relatively high (i.e. only a small amount of humus can be created).

Materials that contain a large percentage of lignins, cellulose or other
biologically resistant components have less to offer plants in the way of
recyclable nutrients but contribute significantly more to the formation of
humus.

Different plants inherently have different ratios of these organic components
but variance also appears in the same plants at different stages of their
life.
Green leaves from deciduous trees, for example, have a very different
analysis
of proteins vs other components than their dry, fallen counterparts. Figure 3
shows the changes that occur in rye plants from early growth to maturity. At
the
young, succulent stage, organic matter from this source would not contribute
very much substance for the accumulation of humus but would benefit more the
immediate needs of microorganisms and plants. Whereas, near the end of its
life,
the rye plants would add little to the nutrient needs of plants and soil life
but provide more raw materials needed for the formation of humus.

During humification not only are the organic components altered by microbial
processing but the ratio that existed in the original residues is changed.
Figure 4 illustrates how the balance of components in straw changes from
decomposition. The increase of some components and decrease of others is not
magical. The nutrient needs of microbes involved in the decomposition process
are taken from any available sources in the soil and reflected in the analysis
change from raw material to compost. As the compost humifies further the
changes
become even more pronounced (see figure 2).

Biologically resistant components such as lignins, fats and waxes are
structurally and chemically changed by microbial processing. Other
biologically
resistant carbon compounds are created by microorganisms as by-products of
their
decay activities. These decay resistant compounds are what humus is made of.
This is not to say that humus is immune from further decay, but its resistance
to decomposition is at a level that enables it to exist for decades if not
centuries as a soil conditioner, a habitat for microbial life and a vast
reservoir of plant and microbial nutrient.

Energy

Humus is essentially a massive storage battery containing energy that was
originally derived from the sun. Researchers in England discovered that an
acre
(furrow slice) of soil with 4 percent organic matter contains as much energy
as
20-25 tons of anthracite coal. Another researcher in Maine equated the energy
in
that amount of organic matter to 4000 gallons of #2 fuel oil. This organic
energy, which is stored as carbon compounds, was originally derived from the
sun
by autotrophic organisms such as plants that can extract carbon from
atmospheric carbon dioxide. About one percent of the energy from the sun that
reaches plant leaves is used to photosynthesize carbon compounds. During the
plants' life much of the energy that is absorbed from the sun is utilized for
growth, foliage production, flowering, seed production and other functions.
About 10 percent of the absorbed energy, initially from the sun, is left
available to a consumer, e.g. an animal that eats and digests the plant. Like
the plant, the animal uses most of the energy it consumes for functions such
as
growth and sustenance but can offer about 10 percent of the energy it derived
from plants to the next consumer in the food chain.

Subsequent digestions through the food chain continue the rapid depletion of
available energy from one trophic level to the next. The final consumers of
this
energy reside in the soil. In figure 5 an arbitrary quantity of energy has
been
used as an example to show its flow and use. In this case, the 1 million
calories of energy offered by the sun is reduced to 1 calorie of available
energy by the time it flows through the food chain to soil saprophytes.
However,
during the season when plants are active about 20% of the carbon that they
absorb from the atmosphere is exuded through the roots as photosynthesized
carbon compounds and utilized by organisms living on, near or within the root
surface. This phenomena provides a direct and constant flow of plant
synthesized
energy for many soil microorganisms.
Obviously, the level of energy available from plant residues is higher than
what
can be offered by the remains of herbivores which is higher that what is
available from the residues of carnivores. The various energy levels of
different residues stimulate populations of different soil organisms that
perform different functions in the soil. Their populations are controlled by
the
amount and type of residues introduced into the soil and the production of
humus is controlled by these organisms.

Carbon Cycle

Throughout this digestion and assimilation process, from the consumption of
the
sun's energy by the plant to the decomposition of all residues in the soil,
carbon is released back into the atmosphere as carbon dioxide. The evolution
of
carbon dioxide from organic matter is an integral part of the life cycle. If
CO2
did not evolve, atmospheric carbon would not be available, the earth would be
buried in humus and life could not exist. Figure 6 examines the cycle of
carbon
from the atmosphere, through the food chain and back into the atmosphere.
Plants
and other autotrophic organisms (producers) need carbon dioxide in the
atmosphere to live. Without it, no heterotrophic organisms (consumers), which
depend on the producers for energy, could exist either.
Over a one year period and under average conditions, about 60% to 70% of the
carbon in organic residues is recycled back to the atmosphere as carbon
dioxide.
Five to ten percent is assimilated into the biomass and the rest resides in
new
humus.

Colloidal Properties

Colloidal refers to the attraction certain soil particles have for cations
which
are positively charged ions of soil nutrients. Whether organic (humus) or
mineral (clay), the colloid is very small and carries a negative
electro-magnetic charge that can hold cation nutrients in a manner that allows
plant roots access to them. This phenomena is called cation exchange.

When decomposed organic matter reaches a certain level of "maturity" and can
be
referred to as humus it gains colloidal properties which react, in terms of
cation exchange, almost identically to mineral colloids. However, humus can
have
a far greater capacity to adsorb cations than clay, especially in a soil
with a
near neutral pH.

In the soil scientists' quest to isolate and define humus, many terms such as
humic acid, fulvic acid, humates, humins and ulmins were developed to help
literalize their findings. Some of these terms have relatively complicated
definitions and are used to identify the different compounds produced by
various
chemical extraction methods. Most are too general and ill-defined for the
complexities of humus. However, it is helpful to be familiar with two of these
terms, i.e. humates and humic acid, to understand the colloidal properties of
humus.

When humus particles called micelles are formed the chemical composition is
predominantly carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen and oxygen (see figure 7). The
hydrogen
ions that reside in compounds on the surface of the micelle can be displaced
by
other cations such as calcium, magnesium, potassium or sodium (see figure 8).
By chemical definition, any compound that contains displaceable hydrogen is an
acid...hence humic acid.

If the hydrogen ions are displaced with base cations such as potassium,
calcium
or magnesium the new compound is considered chemically to be the salt of humic
acid or humate.

By weight, hydrogen accounts for only a small percentage of humic acid but
because the atoms of this element are the smallest and lightest of all
elements
its numbers are overwhelmingly higher than any other. Each location of a
hydrogen ion on the surface of the micelle can potentially become an exchange
site for a base cation. The tremendous amount of surface area of humic
particles
coupled with the high number of exchangeable H+ ions can significantly
increase
the cation exchange capacity (CEC) of any given soil.

In soil conditions where hydrogen ion activity is high (i.e. low pH), humus
becomes saturated with adsorbed hydrogen ions and is called humic acid (HA).
HAs
have the ability to react with mineral particles in the soil liberating base
ions such as potassium, magnesium and calcium. As more and more bases are
released and are adsorbed to the humic colloid, replacing H+, HA is chemically
changed into humates.

Humates, are essentially organic colloids that are saturated with base
cations.
A rich soil with a near neutral pH would contain a high level of humates.
Whereas the same soil with a low pH would be replete with humic acids.
Unfortunately, many humic substances can dissolve and leach to lower soil
horizons in a low pH environment such as in a New England forest.

Soil Conditioning

Humus is an amazing soil conditioner. Only 5% humus will transform lifeless
rock
dust into rich loam. It has abilities to both bind sand and granulate clay.

In sandy soils, plant and microbial mucilages from humus clog up the porous
environment, increasing the moisture holding capacities and slowing down the
percolation of soil water, with all the dissolved nutrients it contains. As
the
moisture content increases, more plants and microbes can inhabit the
environment, accelerating the creation of more humus. Under ideal conditions,
the advancement of humus in sand eventually will develop the most preferred
type
of loam for plant production. Unfortunately, conditions for the development
of
humus in sand are not always ideal. In tropical environments, for example,
where
moisture and temperature are optimum for populations of decomposition
bacteria,
organic matter is quickly assimilated back into the biomass. Coupled with the
abundance of oxygen in a porous sand, it is difficult if not impossible for
humus to accumulate.

In clay soils, humus forms an alliance with clay particles. Both particles are
colloidal; i.e. they have an electro-negative charge capable of attracting and
holding cation nutrients. Complexes are formed in the soil between the two
particles which not only increases the soil's overall CEC but also mitigates
the
cohesive nature of clay, causing granulation.

The accumulation of humus is naturally easier in clay soil than in sand
because
the environmental conditions for decay bacteria are often not as ideal.
Moisture
levels in clay soils often reach the saturation point leaving little room for
oxygen needed by aerobic life. Soil water also acts as a buffer for
temperature
changes keeping the much needed heat level for microbial activity at a
minimum,
In addition, the evaporation of moisture from the surface actually has a
cooling
effect on the soil (just as evaporation of perspiration from the skin cools
the
body).

Clay can also assist in the stabilization of humus. The clay-humus complexes
formed in the soil can further inhibit bacterial decomposition and can
increase
the lifespan of humus to over a thousand years. Soil scientists calculate that
in Allophanic soils (a volcanic clay soil) the mean residence time of humus
ranges from 2000 to 5000 years.

Over time and under the best of conditions, humus can eventually change both
clays and sandy soils into media that are visible similar.

Accumulation/Destruction

In an uncultivated, natural environment, humus accumulates in accordance with
the favorable or unfavorable conditions of the region. Unless global or
regional
conditions change, the level of humus accumulation reaches an equilibrium
with
the factors that destroy it and it becomes a relatively fixed component of
that
environment.

In cultivated environments, humus is an important asset which, like most other
assets, is easier to maintain than it is to replace. Unfortunately, the value
of
humus is, oftentimes, not fully realized until it is severely depleted and
its
benefits are no longer available.

Old, stable humus is biologically resistant. Depending on the environmental
conditions under which it exists humus can sit in the soil for centuries, even
millenniums, with only a minimal amount of decomposition occurring. However
slight, decay still occurs and eventually even old humus will cycle back from
where it came. The formation of new humus is critical to maintaining a stable
presence of this asset in the soil.

Current agricultural and horticultural practices have little effect on old,
stable humus. However, many of those methods of cultivation can destroy new
humus in the formative stages when it is more vulnerable to decay than its
older
counterpart.

Figure 9 shows a typical response of organic matter introduced into the soil.
It
is important to note that even under the best of conditions, a relatively
small
amount of humus is created in comparison to the level of organic matter
initially introduced.

If conditions exist that further accelerate the decomposition of organic
matter,
even less humus will eventually be created. In extremes such as tropical
environments where moisture, heat and soil oxygen are abundant, a lot of
carbon
dioxide is evolved but not much in the way of humus.

Aeration from the plow or rototiller is probably the most significant factor
in
the depletion of native humus levels of cultivated topsoil. That, coupled
with
mono-cultural practices and the absence of organic carbon in fertilizer
materials has cause a greater than 50 percent decline in native humus levels
over the years on many of the farms throughout the U.S. This represents a loss
that probably, will never be recovered. Even old humus complexes that are
normally very resistant to decay can be fractured by cultivation and made more
vulnerable to biological processes.

Excessive applications of lime can significantly accelerate the decomposition
process of humus. The low pH in acid soils inhibit the activities of bacteria.
As the pH is raised by applications of lime, bacteria populations grow and a
relative increase in decomposition occurs. Experiments done back in 1920 show
a
marked increase in CO2 evolution (a measure of organic matter decomposition)
as
varying amounts of lime were added to soil. (See fig. 10) A small amount of
calcium can stimulate plant growth to the point where the increased amount of
residues added to the soil balance the loss from greater microbial activity.
However, excessive lime applications can hasten the destruction of humus at a
pace greater than the plant residues can accumulate it.

Excess nitrogen applied to crops is another culprit. The effect of adding too
much nitrogen to the soil is very similar to what happens when it is added to
a
pile of slowly composting carbonaceous organic matter such as dry leaves or
saw
dust. The temperature of the pile is raised immediately, large volumes of
carbon
dioxide are released and the whole process of decomposition is accelerated
exponentially. The reaction occurs regardless of the type of nitrogen added
(i.e. organic or inorganic).

Humus in the soil has more real value than money, real estate, stocks or
bonds.
Its value doesn't fluctuate; it doesn't become scarce in a recession; it's
worth
can't be depleted by inflation and it can't be stolen. It is the direct or
indirect source of sustenance for all life on earth. It can sometimes be lost
by
environmental changes but more often, its demise is from either the apathy or
the inadvertent errors of the steward who tends it.

Humus is a renewable resource. Its presence in the soil can be maintained
indefinitely. Unfortunately, many agricultural and horticultural practices are
essentially mining humus. Like other mined products, such as coal, minerals
and
oil, the natural resource can eventually be exhausted.

Summary

The popular scientific definition of humus is "A more or less biologically
stable, dark, amorphous material formed by the microbial decomposition of
plant
and animal residues". It is difficult to visibly differentiate humus from
organic matter in other stages of decay. Compost, well rotted manures and peat
are not necessarily humus. However, at some hard-to-define point, all of these
organic materials will contribute immeasurably to the humus content in the
soil.

It is not realistic to think that one can quantify or qualify humus production
from contributions of organic matter to soil. There are too many factors that
control its formation and existence in the soil environment. One can only
assume
that cultural practices that both minimize the depletion and contribute to
the
formation of humus will maintain the best possible level of soil humus for
each
individual environment.

Glossary

Actinomycetes - Decay microorganisms that have a fungus-like appearance but,
like bacteria, do not contain a well defined nucleus.
Adsorption - The adherence of one material to the surface of another via
electro-magnetic forces, e.g. dust to a television screen.
Aerobic - Needing oxygen to live.
Anaerobic - Needing an environment with little or no oxygen to live.
Assimilation - Digestion and diffusion of nutrients by an organism for growth
and/or sustenance.
Autotrophs - organisms that can synthesize carbon compounds from atmospheric
carbon dioxide utilizing energy from light or chemical reactions.
Base cation - A positively charged ion, historically belonging to the earth
metal family e.g. potassium, magnesium, calcium, etc.
Biomass - The accumulative mass of all living things in a given environment.
Carbon : Nitrogen ratio - a ratio measured by weight of the number of parts
carbon to each part nitrogen e.g. 10:1, 50:1, etc.
Carnivores - Organisms that consume animals or insects for sustenance.
Cation - An ion of an element or compound with a positive electro-magnetic
charge.
Cation exchange capacity - The total amount of exchangeable cations that a
given soil can adsorb.
Colloids - Very small soil particles with a negative electro-magnetic charge
capable of attracting, holding and exchanging cations.
Faunal - Pertaining to microscopic or visible animals.
Floral - Pertaining to plants or bacteria, fungi, actinomycetes, etc.
Free oxygen - Gaseous oxygen not bound to other elements as in oxides,
hydroxides or water for example.
Furrow slice - Plow depth of approximately 6 - 7 inches.
Hemicellulose - A carbohydrate resembling cellulose but more soluble; found in
the cell walls of plants.
Herbivores - Organisms that consume plants for sustenance.
Heterotrophs - Organisms capable of deriving nutrient for growth and
sustenance
from organic compounds but incapable of synthesizing carbon compounds from
atmospheric carbon dioxide.
Humification - The biological process of converting organic matter into humic
substances.
Humology - The study of humus.
Lignin - A biologically resistant fibrous compound deposited in the cell walls
of cellulose whose purpose is for strength and support of stems, branches,
roots, etc.
Micelle - (Micro-cell) A negatively charged (colloidal) soil particle most
commonly found in either a mineral form (i.e. clay) or organic form (i.e.
humus).
Mineralized - The biological process of transforming organic compounds into
non-organic compounds (minerals) e.g. mineralization of protein into ammonium.
Monoculture - The cultural practice of growing only one variety of crop in a
specific area every season without variance.
Mucilage - compounds synthesized by plants and microbes that swell in water,
taking on a gelatinous consistency, that function to maintain a moist
environment.
Saprophyte - an organism that can absorb nutrient from dead organic matter.
Taxonomy - Science of classification.
Trophic levels - Levels of consumers within a food chain in relation to
producers of organic nutrient such as plants e.g. producers - primary
consumers
- secondary consumers - tertiary consumers - decay organisms.

References

Albrecht, W.A. 1938, Loss of Organic Matter and its Restoration. U.S.
Department
of Agriculture Yearbook 1938, pp 347-376.
ASA# 47. 1979, Microbial - Plant Interactions. American Society of Agronomy.
Madison, WI
Bear, F.E. 1924, Soils and Fertilizers. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, NY
Brady, N.C. 1974, The Nature and Properties of soils. MacMillan Publishing Co.
Inc. New York, NY
Huang, P.M. and M. Schnitzer 1986, Interactions of Soil Minerals with Natural
Organics and Microbes. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, WI
Makarov, I.B. 1986, Seasonal Dynamics of Soil Humus Content. Moscow University
Soil Science Bulletin, v41 #3 pp 19-26.
Parnes, R. 1986, Organic & Inorganic Fertilizers. Woods End Agricultural
Institute. Mt. Vernon, ME
SSSA 1987, Soil Fertility and Organic Matter as Critical Components of
Production Systems. Soil Science Society of America, Inc. Madison, WI
Waksman, S.A. 1936, Humus. Williams and Wilkins, Inc. Baltimore, MD

*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 4/7/2006 at 6:43 AM Robert Monie wrote:

>Hi Marty,
>
> The study of the rhizosphere in relation to edible plants is in its
>infancy. It turns out, as you say, that the microbes in products like
>Biovam do not promote the growth of brassicas (cabbage, mustard, brussels
>sprouts, broccoli, most Asian greens) in general, but other rhizosphere
>microbes that have not been studied as much undoubtedly do. A 2005 study
>by Piyush Pandey et al (see http://lib.bioinfo.pl/meid:623 --scroll down
>to Piyush Pandey) shows that Pseudomonas aeruginosa GRC1 culture isolated
>from the potato rhizosphere clearly enhances the growth of Indian mustard
>(Brassica campestris).
>
> Does this mean it might be a good idea to plant potatoes near brassicas?
>Perhaps. I've always found that brassicas thrive more following a cover
>crop of buckwheat than they do following a cover of ryegrass. Microbial
>culture collected from buckwheat roots may be supportive of brassica
>growth, but so far as I know there have been no well-controlled
>experiments to test this, and nobody has a "brassica enhancement"
>microbial product on the market.
>
> The field is wide open for experimentation; let's hope researchers jump
>in and come up with some practical advice that farmers can use. Till then,
>we can grow potatoes and buckwheat with our brassicas and see what
>happens.
>
> Bob Monie
>
> Marty Kraft <martyk@allspecies.org> wrote:
> Micorizzal fungi seem to give many plants a boost however some plants
>like broccoli, beets and spinach are said not to form associations with
>micorizzal fungi. Does anyone know if some other microorganism
>functions for these plants (like broccoli) the way micorizzal fungi do
>for the plants they associate with?
>
>Marty Kraft
>






Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page