Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

livingontheland - [Livingontheland] Strategies for Survival by Jim Kunstler

livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Healthy soil and sustainable growing

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tradingpost" <tradingpost@gilanet.com>
  • To: livingontheland@lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Livingontheland] Strategies for Survival by Jim Kunstler
  • Date: Sun, 20 Jun 2004 22:13:42 -0600

Strategies for Survival by Jim Kunstler
Notes on the Coming Transformation of American Life
http://www.kunstler.com/mags_diaryplus.html

I get e-mail from people who object to what they construe to be an
excessively pessimistic view of our national scene. Well, what if you
suggested to the people of Germany in 1936 that Dresden would be turned
into an ashtry within a decade and that Berliners would cut down all the
trees in the Tiergarten to heat their homes?
What I've been suggesting about the direction of our country is hardly
that drastic.
I personally believe that there is much we can do as a nation, and as
a collection of communities, to mitigate the problems I have been
describing, even to create conditions in which American civilization can
advance beyond the hardships of the early 21st century.
The overriding imperative task for us in the face of the problems
ahead will be the downscaling of virtually all activities in America. This
should not be misunderstood. I do not mean that we ought to become any less
of a nation, or less of a democracy, only that the scale at which we
conduct the work of American life will have to be adjusted to fit the
requirements of a post-globalist, post-cheap-oil age. The future is already
telling us very clearly what must be done. If we fail to pay attention, we
risk very costly distraction in political turmoil, military mischief, civil
disturbance, and permanent economic loss.
I will focus here on examples of three national "systems," so to
speak, that will have to be downscaled sooner rather than later: retail
trade, agriculture, and schooling.
America made the unfortunate choice (by inattention, really) of
allowing nearly all of its retail trade to be consolidated by a very few
huge national operations, the Wal-Marts and other gigantic discounters.
Many Americans viewed this as a bonanza of bargain shopping without
noticing the significant losses and costs entailed to their communities,
and to the long-term health of their nation's economy. I have described the
extreme vulnerability of the giant national retail operations to the
vicissitudes ahead: disrupted oil markets, far-flung supply chains, and so
forth. When these behemoths go down - and they will go down hard and fast -
everyday retail trade will have to be reorganized in America. This is a
tremendous task.
It will have to be reorganized at the local and regional scale. It
will have to be based on moving merchandise shorter distances at multiple
increments and probably by multiple modes of transport. It is almost
certain to result in higher costs for the things we buy - which is another
way of stating we face a period of austerity - but it is apt to bring back
many lost civic benefits in return. The national chains eliminated
practically all the "middlemen," who were disparaged as parasites adding
needless costs to everyday products. The fact is that these middlemen, the
wholesalers, jobbers, warehousers, distributors, played necessary roles in
a complex system that operated very differently than the current model.
They were members of local communities; they were economic participants in
their communities; they made decisions that had to take the needs of their
communities into account; they were caretakers of civic institutions, and
they were employers. We will need this category of business person again,
as we will need the local retailer, the persons and families who run local
businesses trading with the public at large. We will need a multi-layered
system for the distribution of regular goods, even if it costs more to
operate.
Some of the infrastructure needed to re-localize American commerce is
there, though it is not in very good shape - the urban downtowns, small
town main streets and business districts. Some of the big boxes might be
integrated with it - dead Kmarts may be the local warehouses of the future,
and some shopping centers and malls may be retrofitted into neighborhood
centers - but much of this newer car-oriented fabric will more likely end
up as salvage. The railroad system the US needs to replace the long-haul
trucking system that we have relied on for decades is also in poor shape,
but railroad track is much easier to repair and restore per mile than
comparable amounts of interstate highway. Perhaps our biggest problem is
that so many products we're accustomed to are no longer manufactured in the
United States. The factories themselves have physically disappeared. Hence,
another feature of the years ahead: for a period of time, Americans may
have to make do with a lot less and with smaller selections of fewer
products. This is another reason to regard the coming era as one of
austerity.
It would be a mistake to take this view of the coming decades as
nostalgic. The future will simply demand it. I happen to believe that there
is much to gain in amenity from the downscaling of American life. We will
benefit from knowing the people we do business with. There is a good chance
that many people currently underemployed will find a gainful niche to
occupy in the reorganization of American trade, and communities will
benefit from their being gainfully occupied. But at the same time, we will
be saying goodbye to a way of life which, however unsustainable and even
crazy it might have been, was a set of arrangements we had grown accustomed
to, and it is never easy for a culture to change the way it does things as
fundamental as everyday commerce.
Agriculture faces a similar predicament. Today, we grow a few
monocultures of grain or milk or beef or pork in vast quantities on
gigantic factory farms, process most of the outputs at a similar enormous
scale, and truck it great distances to gigantic super-stores. The end of
cheap oil means this will no longer be possible. We are going to have to
grow at least some of our food closer to home. We will have to do it with
fewer petroleum inputs, the fossil-fuel-based fertilizers and pesticides.
Our methods will have to be along lines that are today labeled as
"organic." Farming will have to be done at a smaller scale, and it will
probably entail more intensive human labor. A class of people will
re-emerge on the scene: American agricultural laborers. Their lives will
probably be far from idyllic. Don't count on this kind of work being done
by foreign migrants when we are engaged in border disputes and demographic
/ territorial contests with Mexico. When the US economy shudders and
stumbles, life will become worse by orders of magnitude in Mexico, which is
already struggling.
The re-localization of farming in America is going to be very
difficult. Our relationship with land the past half century has been one
almost exclusively of brutal commodity exploitation. A lot of farmland in
California is close to being ruined from over-irrigation; you can see the
salt precipitates in the fields off Interstate Five in the Central Valley
today. Some of the best eastern farmland has been paved over. The years
ahead will require us to rediscover a relationship of caring for land and
doing so by hand, tenderly. In an age when the farmland around our towns
and cities seemed to have value only as potential development - for
monocultures of suburban houses and discount shopping - stewardship was
regarded as merely prissy. In the future, our lives will depend on how we
take care of the land.
The re-localization of agriculture presumes that many so-called
value-added activities will take place on a more local and regional basis,
too: the conversion of milk into dairy products, the production of meats,
hams, sausages, wine, preserved foods, and so on. Europeans never stopped
doing this. Their models and methods exist to be emulated, and we will have
to do it as the end of globalism becomes a more emphatic condition of life.
Today, there are probably fewer than fifty immense factories producing most
of the cheese in America, all absolutely dependent on long-haul trucking
based on cheap diesel fuel. Twenty years in the future, there may be
thousands of smaller dairies operating across the US. They will probably
put out better products. They will employ people in complex vocations. They
will have regional differences.
The downscaling of agriculture presents some obvious problems. Farms
take years to establish. The knowledge for running diverse, small-scale
farms becomes a little more lost every day as elderly farmers die and the
culture of farming dies with them. Theend of the cheap oil economy may
bring dysfunction so swiftly to our current arrangements that we will not
have time to make an orderly transition. This could result in a specific
food emergency in the US that might go on for years. As the Chinese proverb
goes: a well-fed person may have many problems but a starving person only
has one problem - another reason to be prepared for political strife here
in the US. In the meantime, we may see swiss chard and potatoes sprout
where formerly the monocultures of Kentucky bluegrass, stoked by oil-based
turf-builders, grew so luxuriantly on the lawns of suburbia.
School, is another major system facing drastic reorganization. The
failure of schooling in America is already manifest. Our inner-city schools
are in nearly complete state of entropy due to the effects of our overall
disinvestment in cities - the school buildings themselves are crumbling
while books and supplies are beyond the point of critical shortage - and to
an array of social conditions ranging from the disintegration of families
to the absence of standards of normative behavior. Whether these might all
be lumped together as the consequences of poverty is debatable, in my
opinion, but the effects are not debatable. These schools are not producing
literate citizens with adequate social skills.
Gigantic alienating schools are producing so much anxiety and
depression that multiple slayings have occurred at regular intervals in
recent years.
Our schools are too big. The centralized suburban schools with their
fleets of buses will become rapidly obsolete when the first oil market
disruptions occur. The inner city schools will be too broken to fix. The
suburban schools will be too large to heat economically (especially since
the overwhelming majority of them all over the nation, regardless of
climate, are sprawling one-story modernist boxes). School will have to be
reorganized on a local basis, at a much smaller scale, in smaller buildings
that do not look like medium security prisons. School will be required for
fewer years, and with more deliberate sorting of children into academic and
vocational tracks. Children will have to live closer to the schools they
attend - the yellow bus fleets will be history. Children and teachers will
benefit from being in physically smaller institutions where all will at
least have the chance to know one another. In a post-cheap-oil world, teens
might be needed to work part of the day or part of the year.
Leon Botstein, President of Bard College and one of the leading
reformers of education in America, has argued that people need to finish
regular school by age 16 and assume a new set of responsibilities to
increase their sense of adulthood.13 He advocates abolishing high school as
it is now known altogether. Years from now fewer will go on to college.
Colleges, too, are likely to go through severe downsizing, especially the
enormous state universities, as college ceases to be a mass consumer
activity. Real life may not be so easily postponable. Vocational trades
requiring real skills may gain in status and some professions such as law
may lose status (and earning power). Some occupations - public relations,
travel agentry, authoring books - may shrink or disappear altogether. Work
for many may become a matter of making oneself useful to others with the
added benefit of earning a living.
One hazard to the enterprise of reforming education will be the
psychology of previous investment. We have poured our accumulated national
wealth into building gigantic central schools and galactic-scale university
campuses, with their semi-professional sports facilities and vast parking
lots, and there will be a tendency to try to make them work no matter what
conditions prevail in the real world. But circumstances will demand
nonetheless that we change.
What is liable to happen to these three major activities, retail,
agriculture, and school is also true of virtually all other things we do in
the US. Everything you can imagine from banking to real estate development
to church-going to professional sports will have to reduce its scale and
scope of operation or fail. The problems ahead will compel us to move from
being a culture of quantity to a culture of quality. We will have to make
do with fewer and less, and we can compensate by demanding that it be
finer. We will have to live locally and we can benefit from the restoration
of robust civic relations.
Many of the beliefs and accepted dogmas of the late 20th century will
fall away as a new and very different reality asserts itself. Cultural
relativism will be discredited in an era when it becomes necessary, even
for intellectuals, to make distinctions between good and bad, between
excellence and worthlessness - because our lives may depend on the ability
to make these distinctions. Hierarchies of value will become normative.
Elitism will no longer be a pejorative but rather a recognition that some
things really are better than other things.






  • [Livingontheland] Strategies for Survival by Jim Kunstler, Tradingpost, 06/21/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page