internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] skype/landline adapters vs magicjack?
- From: "Susan LaBarre" <idodesignforchange AT gmail.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] skype/landline adapters vs magicjack?
- Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2008 16:09:24 -0500
I've had a
MagicJack for a few months now. Most of the time it works well... definitely
worth the $$.
Every so
often, the voice breaks up and I have to end the call and use my cell phone. But
for less than $50 the first year and $20 thereafter, it's a great deal and if I
travel, I can take the adapter with me!
I dropped
Vonage so MagicJack is my only phone. I've never used
skype.
Susan
Susan
LaBarre
Dappled Path
Studio
Phone:
919-665-3392
Mobile: 919-656-2216
Email: susan AT dappledpath.com
Web: http://www.dappledpath.com
-
[internetworkers] skype/landline adapters vs magicjack?,
stan briggs, 11/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] skype/landline adapters vs magicjack?, Jim Ray, 11/06/2008
-
Re: [internetworkers] skype/landline adapters vs magicjack?,
Susan LaBarre, 11/06/2008
- Re: [internetworkers] skype/landline adapters vs magicjack?, Bob Kucera, 11/07/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.