internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Mark Turner" <jmarkturner AT gmail.com>
- To: scottchilcote AT earthlink.net, "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] cpni
- Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2007 20:40:13 -0500
Last time I checked T-Mobile doesn't offer service in NC. Or to be more specific, T-Mobile doesn't offer NC phone numbers. It uses GSM and can roam quite easily in AT&T's territory, however. If you don't mind having an out-of-state number you may be fine.
Personally, I use a MNVO called Net10, which uses AT&T's network. I like the pay-as-you-go plan as I'm not a heavy mobile user. I don't know how much info Net10 shares with AT&T. As you can buy the phone with cash from most retailers, it seems a good choice for those who value their privacy.
You can read about my experience with Net10 here:
http://www.markturner.net/index.php?s=mvno
Cheers,
Mark
On Dec 24, 2007 10:12 AM, Scott Chilcote <
scottchilcote AT earthlink.net> wrote:
I think that leaves just T-Mobile. The coverage map on their web site
shows fairly weak service in the triangle. I'd like to find out if it's
better than it looks... Or if T-Mobile has also been making inroads on
the privacy of their customer base.
-
Re: [internetworkers] cpni,
Scott Chilcote, 12/24/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] cpni, Mark Turner, 12/24/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] cpni, Nick, 12/24/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] cpni, Christian Stalberg, 12/30/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.