internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Wolfe, Joanna" <joanna.wolfe AT oup.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 09:59:38 -0400
Yeah, but
If your buddy's in the back seat with a headset - how do you know if
he's watching debbie does dallas v. the little mermaid?
total devil's advocate here.
jw
> ----------
> From: Jeremy Portzer
> Reply To: Internetworkers:
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Sent: Thursday, October 28, 2004 9:56 AM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: RE: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?
>
> On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 09:49, Wolfe, Joanna wrote:
>
> > Since the video screen is not supposed to be used by the driver,
> why
> > is the driver deemed responsible for the content being displayed
> on
> > the screen?
>
> The driver is in control of all aspects of the vehicle and is
> responsible for the proper conduct of the passengers (within
> reasonable
> limits, but I think this would be reasonable).
>
> For example, there are laws limiting open beer cans in cars. If you
> are
> driving and your passenger is drinking a beer, you are still subject
> to
> arrest or citation, even it's clear you never took a sip.
>
> Jeremy
>
> --
> /-------------------------------------------------------------------
> --\
> | Jeremy Portzer jeremyp AT pobox.com trilug.org/~jeremy
> |
> | GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A
> 7B92 |
> \-------------------------------------------------------------------
> --/
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
> An email has been sent to you using your old OUP-USA.ORG address.
> Please reply to this message and give them your OUP.COM address to
> use.
>
>
>
-
Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?,
zman, 10/28/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?,
geschwin, 10/28/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?, zman, 10/28/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?,
geschwin, 10/28/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?, Jeremy Portzer, 10/28/2004
-
[internetworkers] Durham Auto Body Shop Recommendations,
Paul Cory, 10/28/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Durham Auto Body Shop Recommendations,
Carol Thomson, 10/29/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Durham Auto Body Shop Recommendations, Shea Tisdale, 10/29/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Durham Auto Body Shop Recommendations,
Carol Thomson, 10/29/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?, Sil Greene, 10/30/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?,
Wolfe, Joanna, 10/28/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?, Jeremy Portzer, 10/28/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?,
Wolfe, Joanna, 10/28/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?,
zman, 10/28/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?,
Roger Austin, 10/28/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?, Sil Greene, 10/28/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?,
Roger Austin, 10/28/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?,
zman, 10/28/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] drive-by porn?,
zman, 10/28/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.