Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

["Lance A. Brown" <lance AT bearcircle.net>]

Thomas Woods wrote:
> This sets up up to recognize marriages of more than two people, as 
> well.  If we're going to recognize same sex marriage, what is the 
> purpose of limiting the marriage to two people? I mean, if marriage is 
> going to be redefined, let's be sure anyone who wants to marry anyone 
> else has thier rights protected.  Under this rule a whole sorority house 
> could "marry" (whoa guys, calm down ;) to claim medical benefits from 
> one or two members who work.

If they are willing to pay the premiums that would be involved, why 
would this be bad?  Just add "Family + X additional premium Member" to 
the slate of "Employee", "Employee + One", "Family", etc. insurance options.

--[Lance]

--
 Carolina Spirit Quest:  http://www.carolinaspiritquest.org/
 Celebrate The Circle: http://www.angelfire.com/nc/celebratethecircle/
 My LiveJournal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/labrown/