internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
[internetworkers] No conspiracy, just a Columbia/NASA re-entr y decision question
- From: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org (Don H. Hunter, Jr.)
- Subject: [internetworkers] No conspiracy, just a Columbia/NASA re-entr y decision question
- Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:40:38 -0500
Only shuttle re-supply or expedition missions have the shuttle equipped with
the docking mechanism. Because of the mission parameters the shuttle had a
Space Hab lab module installed and did not have a way of docking with the
station.
Don H. Hunter, Jr.
Director, Telecommunications and Information Systems
Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society
PO Box 13975, 99 Alexander Drive
Research Triangle Park, NC 27709
Phone: 1-800-243-6534 extension 235
Fax: 919-549-0090 e-mail: dhunter AT sigmaxi.org
-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Smith [mailto:anilorac AT nc.rr.com]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 9:58 AM
To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [internetworkers] No conspiracy, just a Columbia/NASA re-entry
decision question
Has anyone yet heard a news report about why the shuttle wasn't docked
with the space station during its flight?
Good sense would suggest if there was even a remote question about
potential left wing damage, NASA should have ordered the shuttle to dock
with the space station, where the station's robotic arm with attached
camera could have made a close up visual inspection. The station's arm
was installed sometime ago, and since the shuttle doesn't always carry
its arm, a station docking would have been wise. They all could have
remained safely in space while a crew recovery mission was planned.
I have only seen/heard news reports indicating the flight engineers did
not feel there was a re-entry danger.
K. Jo Garner wrote:
>re: Columbia explosion.
>
>found on alt.music.chapel-hill... take as you will:
>
From: dragonfly_777 AT hotmail.com (Sue S.)
>[1] Re: Space shuttle irony check
>Date: Sun Feb 02 20:12:34 EST 2003
>Organization: http://groups.google.com/
>Lines: 27
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
>Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
>X-Trace: posting.google.com 1044234754 29539 127.0.0.1 (3 Feb 2003
>01:12:34 GMT)
>X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse AT google.com
>NNTP-Posting-Date: 3 Feb 2003 01:12:34 GMT
>
>Other observations:
>
>* The Columbia accident occurred on Feb. 1. In the Celtic tradition,
>this is Imbolc, a fire festival. On this day the Celts honored Brigit,
>the goddess of fire. Brigit was invoked as the "Bright Arrow" and
>"Sudden Flame."
>
>* The Christian Church turned Imbolc into Candlemas, a celebration of
>Mary's visit to the Temple in Jerusalem for a ritualistic purification
>after the birth of Jesus. A story tells of Simeon, a holy man living
>in Jerusalem, who, when Mary entered the Temple, greeted her and the
>child Jesus, and blessed the child as "a light to lighten the
>gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel."
>
>* Palestine, Texas was founded by a group of settlers who hoped to
>build a "New Jerusalem."
>
>* Debris from the shuttle also fell on Nacogdoches, the oldest town in
>Texas and the place where the state's first producing oil well was
>drilled in 1861.
>
>* One piece of tile from the shuttle fell within 75 miles of President
>Bush's ranch in Crawford, Texas.
>
>* "Columbia" is an alias for the United States.
>
>-- Sue
>
>
>
>
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
- [internetworkers] No conspiracy, just a Columbia/NASA re-entr y decision question, Don H. Hunter, Jr., 02/03/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.