internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Edward Wesolowski <ids AT idisplay.com>
- To: internetworkers AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: Digital cash, micro-payments and
- Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2002 11:35:27 -0400
But, again speaking of advocating...
Rural electrification was achived in large part through local co-operatives such as Piedmont Electric, which >serves parts of Carrboro and most of Orange County.I thought that rural electrification was achieved through huge companies ability to establish a 60 cycles per second, AC standard, and government subsidies, funded by taxs, similar to the universal service tax on our phone bills.
And while I'm advocating (I hope there's no punishment for doing this!-), 1940's era NTSC standard for television, comes to mind, that RCA pushed through. NTSC, which still haunts/lives with us today, more than a half century later, was, the birth of an industry. Television wouldn't have been possible without the standard, right?
Ed Wesolowski
========================================
From: Thomas Beckett <thomas AT tbeckett.com>
To: Eudora::"InterNetWorkers" <internetworkers AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
Subject: [internetworkers] Re: Digital cash, micro-payments and
Date: 4/28/02 9:46 PM
Hey, I thought I was advocating for the devil!
But as long as we're advocating, we seem to have achieved universal electrical service without a national monopoly. Rural electrification was achived in large part through local co-operatives such as Piedmont Electric, which serves parts of Carrboro and most of Orange County. In fact, there are numerous small local telephone service providers, such as Mebtel (in Mebane), that have been there all along and are still in business.
TaB
At 09:23 PM 4/28/2002 -0400, you wrote:
>Yeah, AT&T was an innovation powerhouse until the derned federal courts broke it up. There really hasn't been anything >significantly new in telephone technology since then. <g>
Thomas, do you think universal service would have happened without the single AT&T entity?
Yours, advocating for the devil...
Ed W.
At 11:20 PM 4/26/02 -0400, you wrote:
At 06:01 PM 4/26/2002 -0400, you wrote:
This proves a
corollary of the law of increasing returns -- less market fragmentation leads
to faster evolution of related products and services. (Also a good example of
the positive effect that government regulation can have in the technology
sector. In this case, it's esp. impressive as it required cross-border
cooperation.)
Yeah, AT&T was an innovation powerhouse until the derned federal courts broke it up. There really hasn't been anything significantly new in telephone technology since then. <g>
TaB
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to internetworkers as: ids AT idisplay.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to internetworkers as: thomas AT tbeckett.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to internetworkers as: ids AT idisplay.com
To unsubscribe send a blank email to $subst('Email.Unsub')
- Re: Digital cash, micro-payments and, Edward Wesolowski, 04/30/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.