Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - [internetworkers] Internet Workers Living or Working in

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: ids at idisplay.com (Edward Wesolowski)
  • Subject: [internetworkers] Internet Workers Living or Working in
  • Date: Mon Feb 24 09:23:31 2003

I'd be interested.
Ed Wesolowski
========================================

From: "Shea Tisdale" <shea AT sheatisdale.com>
To: Eudora::<cmccarthy1 AT nc.rr.com>;
Eudora::<internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>

Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Internet Workers Living or Working in
Date: 2/24/03 12:26 AM

I'd be interested. I could even host if you like.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Colleen McCarthy" <cmccarthy1 AT nc.rr.com>
To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'"
<internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 5:05 PM
Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Internet Workers Living or Working in
Raleighor Cary


>O.K., here's another idea. I saw "Bowling for Columbine" and loved it. I
>want to rent "Roger and Me" and watch it with a small group. Are any of
the
>rest of you interested? I can host, but my living room TV is only a 27"
>(big living room, small TV, bummer..:) Please let me know. Colleen
>
>Colleen McCarthy, MT(ASCP), BSEE, MBA, PMP
>LIS Administrator
>Laboratory Information Services
>UNC Hospitals/McLendon Clinical Labs
>1106 East Wing
>Chapel Hill, NC 27514
>email: camccart AT unch.unc.edu
>phone: 919-966-2059 beeper 216-1995
>fax: 919-966-6407
>home phone 919-460-0641
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
>[mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org]On Behalf Of Michael
>D. Thomas
>Sent: Sunday, February 23, 2003 1:35 PM
>To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
>Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Internet Workers Living or Working
>inRaleighor Cary
>
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
From: "Colleen McCarthy" <cmccarthy1 AT nc.rr.com>
>
> > The biggest problem that I have with after-work gatherings is ... that
> > they're after work :)! I seem to be able to make all of the parties,
but
> > almost none of the after-work meetings.
>
>Meanwhile, I've been making it to none of the parties :-( Probably why we
>haven't met.
>
>Gatherings, parties and impromptu get togethers are all part of building
>community, and that's what InterNetWorkers is about. The gatherings are
>"official" and predictable, but the only real difference between the
>"unofficial" parties and the gatherings is how they are announced. A
>gathering
>announcement goes out to both lists -- inet-announce and the discussion
>list -- and is announced on the web page, while the "unofficial" parties
are
>only announced by the party giver on the discussion list.
>
>This is reflective of the nature of the lists. Inet-announce is
>announce-only
>and heavily moderated, while the discussion list is free form.
>
>I'd like to propose that we open inet-announce up a bit. We've set the
>expectation that it will be low-volume, but I think that we could send out
a
>couple of additional notes a month without upsetting anyone. We can also
>make
>room on the web site for "unofficial" announcements.
>
>This goes along with the theory that the best networks are multi-headed.
>
>If you have organized something you'd like for the entire INW realm to
know
>about, just drop the note to me for now and cc: this list. I can act as
>moderator for now, though I would like to create some kind of policy so as
>to
>reduce the risk of contention. If you'd like to be part of the process,
let
>me
>know.
>
>And of course, if you don't want your party announcement to go to
>inet-announce, then just don't ask.
>
> > If we know which INWs might be available, then we can
> > meet whenever it works out.
>
>I would like to discuss this idea further... I see possibilities for a
neat
>little community building web/email app of some sort. Don't worry,
>discussing
>doesn't imply "promising to do." We can discuss organizational ideas
without
>fear of future haranguing.
>
>My proposal above goes a little ways, I think, but I bet there is more
that
>can be done.
>
>A lot of the success of the group is due to our use of Internet
technologies
>for community building purposes. However, we haven't done anything
>innovative
>with the technologies in a while. That's a shame. Any suggestions are more
>than welcome, and you can probably get the chance to implement and test
your
>ideas.
>
>Colleen, thanks for your thoughts on this manner and taking the initiative
>to
>better our community and community-building means.
>
>Cheers!
>
>
>
>
>---
>Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
>http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
>You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
>To unsubscribe visit
>http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>
>---
>Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
>You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
>To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers



---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web
site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers



  • [internetworkers] Internet Workers Living or Working in, Edward Wesolowski, 02/24/2003

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page