Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] if everyone homesteaded

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Clansgian AT wmconnect.com
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] if everyone homesteaded
  • Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:22:12 EDT



> >You mention the support of the USSR, so I will present the opposite view.

Good post and good points, Bev, but it is not an 'opposite' view.

The soviets used agriculture to punish some people. For example, in Russia
before the revolution, the pople were under a patronage system of the Czarist
plutarchy. When they went to collective farms it was simply substituting one
taskmaster for an other. But in Belarus and the Ukraine the land had been
held
for centuries by individual farmers, most of them small-holders.

The Soviets wanted all farms to be collective (coming to a country near you
soon) and so instituted policies which rewarded the farmers for selling their
holdings to the collective and economically punished those who resisted. By
taking all collectively produced food and shipping it out of counry, denying
farmers equipment, feed, seeds, etc. and other policies,. the Soviets hoped
to
starve the people into submission. The result was the 'holodomor' [Ukrainian
for 'death by starvation'] and by the mid 1930's they had managed to starve
eight million people to death.

But in the case of Cuba the Soviets did not want the communist country so
close to hte US to fail, so they shipped them farm equipment, chemical
fertilizer, and fuel to grow sugar cane and then bought all they produced at
as much as
ten times the word's going rate for sugar. When the USSR collapsed, the
Cubans had to offer their sugar on a world market at going prices with
predictable
results. They had been used to selling the overpriced sugar and buying
almost
all their food ... and why not? If you could grow a commodity for a
guaranteed buyer at ten times the going price, why waste your effort growing
food
which you can buy cheaply?

I would submit to you that it's not an opposite view, it is simply a
recounting of how the Soviets treated one people differently than another for
their
own purposes. But I would say that in the end the results aren't all that
different. Never is with socialism.


James




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page