Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - [Homestead] Stone cold killing machines

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: bobf <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Homestead] Stone cold killing machines
  • Date: Sun, 4 Jan 2009 14:57:36 -0800 (PST)

I almost didn't read this article in today's Washington Post. I am not an
enthusiast of military knowledge, and the title sounded a bit like Assimov.
But, if the author has any credibilty, there is about to be an amzing
transformation in the way power is applied in this world. This is one of the
most surprising articles I have read concerning 'anything' coming up in the
near futre. It is absolutely fascinating. I wont try to give a summary, I'd
probably explain it wrong. But, this could indirectly affect everyone, and
maybe in ways that aren't good for civil liberties; I know already I don't
like the new applications of the unmanned aerial vehicles; though; if
someone has to have this technology, I'm glad we are to have it first.........

------------------------------------------------------------------

Coming to the Battlefield: Stone-Cold Robot Killers


By John Pike
Sunday, January 4, 2009; Page B03

Armed robotic aircraft soar in the skies above Pakistan, hurling death down
on America's enemies in the war on terrorism. Soon -- years, not decades,
from now -- American armed robots will patrol on the ground as well,
fundamentally transforming the face of battle. Conventional war, even
genocide, may be abolished by a robotic American Peace.

The detachment with which the United States can inflict death upon our
enemies is surely one reason why U.S. military involvement around the world
has expanded over the past two decades. The excellence of American military
technology makes it possible for U.S. forces to inflict vast damage upon the
enemy while suffering comparatively modest harm in return.

War is about the sacrifice of blood and treasure, and the American style of
war is to substitute treasure for blood. From the early days of the republic,
when Eli Whitney is said to have used interchangeable parts to manufacture
superior muskets, to the invention of Gatling guns and Kevlar armor, American
ingenuity has been devoted to devising ever more efficient ways of killing
the enemy and preventing the enemy from killing us.

One common factor in much of American military prowess is the surprisingly
obscure fact of modern life known as Moore's Law. Gordon Moore, a co-founder
of Intel, noticed nearly half a century ago that computing power seemed to be
doubling about every two years. Laptops, cellphones, the Internet -- they're
simply commentaries on Moore's Law.


The rapid emergence of the armed unmanned air vehicles (UAVs) that roam over
Pakistan is a sequel to Moore's Law. Onboard computers became far more
powerful, so automatic pilots became far more competent. Signal processors
became more sophisticated, facilitating collection and processing of more
interesting intelligence. Global Positioning System receivers shrank and
could be economically employed on small robotic aircraft. Precision-guided
munitions could deliver lethal firepower. And so forth.

The U.S. Navy has arguably moved farthest toward substituting treasure for
blood. A generation ago the Reagan administration brought World War II-era
battleships out of mothballs to provide gunfire support to onshore
operations. With a crew of more than 1,500, these ships were designed to be
manned by the low-paid draftees of the 1940s, not the more amply rewarded
volunteers of the 1980s. The Navy couldn't afford them, and the ships were
soon returned to mothballs. In their place, the Navy came up with the new
DDG-1000 Zumwalt destroyer, an automated warship with a crew of only 150.

The Air Force is also moving down this path. Long skeptical of UAVs, it has
begun to embrace them as the future of air power. Piloted aircraft face
fundamental limits of crew fatigue. Heavy bombers flying from the island base
of Diego Garcia to Afghanistan would spend more than a dozen hours flying to
and from the target area, leaving little time for loitering over it. In
contrast, large bomber-size UAVs can spend days over the target. At some
point in the next decade, the Air Force will begin replacing cockpits with
robotic pilots.

The Army has benefited far less than the Navy and the Air Force from the
substitution of treasure for blood. In World War II, the Sherman tank had a
crew of five. Sixty years later, the Abrams tank has a crew of four. In World
War II, the M1 Garand rifle required one infantryman to pull the trigger, and
today's M16 requires the same -- not exactly a testament to improved labor
productivity.

But now the Army stands on the threshold of one of the greatest
transformations in war-fighting history, on the short list with steel and
gunpowder. The Future Combat Systems program is aimed at developing an array
of new vehicles and systems -- including armed robots. The robots of past
science fiction were governed by Isaac Asimov's Three Laws, which precluded
bringing harm to humans. But the real robots of the future will be different.
Within a decade, the Army will field armed robots with intellects that
possess, as H.G. Wells put it, "minds that are to our minds as ours are to
those of the beasts that perish, intellects vast and cool and unsympathetic."

Let us dwell on "unsympathetic." These killers will be utterly without
remorse or pity when confronting the enemy. That's something new. In 1947,
military historian S.L.A. Marshall published "Men Against Fire," which
documented the fundamental difference between real soldiers and movie
soldiers: Most real soldiers will not shoot at the enemy. Most won't even
discharge their weapons, and most of the rest do no more than spray bullets
in the enemy's general direction. These findings remain controversial, but
the hundreds of thousands of bullets expended in Iraq for every enemy
combatant killed suggests that it's not too far off the mark.

Only a few troops, perhaps 1 percent, will actually direct aimed fire at the
enemy with the intent to kill. These troops are treasured, and set apart, and
called snipers.

Armed robots will all be snipers. Stone-cold killers, every one of them. They
will aim with inhuman precision and fire without human hesitation. They will
not need bonuses to enlist or housing for their families or expensive
training ranges or retirement payments. Commanders will order them onto
battlefields that would mean certain death for humans, knowing that the worst
to come is a trip to the shop for repairs. The writing of condolence letters
would become a lost art.




No human army could withstand such an onslaught. Such an adversary would
present the enemy with the simple choice of martyrdom or flight. So equipped,
America's military would be irresistible in battle.

This would not be a panacea. Thugs would still rob pedestrians, organized
crime would persist and so too would terrorists and other small bands of men
of violence. But the large-scale organized killing that has characterized six
millenniums of human history could be ended by the fiat of the American
Peace.

Genocide, and the failure of the outside word to intervene, could also become
a thing of the past. The industrialized murder of the Holocaust could perhaps
have been disrupted by Allied bombers, but subsequent genocides have been
less institutionalized, and far less vulnerable to air power. Intervention
would require infantry and a decision to accept casualties. Genocide
prevention may be in the interest of our common humanity, but it has never
been in the national interest. But with no body bags to explain to bewildered
voters, America's leaders may be less hesitant in the future about imposing
an end to atrocities in places such as Darfur.

john AT globalsecurity.org


John Pike is the director of the military information Web site
GlobalSecurity.org.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/02/AR2009010202191.html?hpid=opinionsbox1









Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page