Homestead mailing list

["Lynda" <lurine AT softcom.net>]

Bomb Scare Suggests Blair Knew and Did Nothing
Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet | July 9 2005 | 09.07.2005 14:50

 Israeli intelligence warnings indicate government 'looked the other way' as
bombers struck.

 Evidence of specific plans to target transport links in major UK cities was
known to the Blair government two days before the attack but was
purposefully ignored while the terrorists moved in for the kill.

 The northern city of Sheffield was buzzing with talk of bomb scares on
buses two days before London was hit with four deadly explosions, one of
which decimated a number 30 bus near Russell Square.

 A number of sources in different areas of the city have confirmed to this
writer that all Sheffield buses were delayed for an hour or more as they
were sent back to the depot to be checked for bombs. This occured early
Tuesday evening, less than 48 hours before the London attack.

 Sheffield's supertram system was also affected by the bomb scare. The
supertram is basically an identical system to the London Underground, but it
operates on standard ground level roads.

The bomb scare was the topic of every bus and tram terminal conversation in
the city center. A high police presence was also visible at many terminals
in the area.

 Strangely enough the local print and television media didn't cover the bomb
scare at all, this in a town where a traffic accident is top story for three
days running. This suggests the police passed on a directive not to report
on the incident.

 The BBC did carry an article suggesting the bomb scare was due to a package
being placed outside a government building. If this is the case then why
were buses and trams that didn't even pass Bridge Street also diverted for
an hour or more? And why, as many others subsequently reported, were police
stopping red Subaru cars all over the city?

 Although a major city, Sheffield hasn't been bombed since world war two and
even bomb scares are very rare occurances. A bomb scare in Sheffield that
impacts public transport less than two days before the London bombing and
the blackout of the media in covering it is highly suspicious.

 More so in light of the fact that intelligence sources are indicating that
Israel warned the British government of attacks two days before the London
bombing and also that other similar attacks had been aborted (the empty
package outside the Sheffield government building?) The intelligence sources
say Blair turned a blind eye to the warnings because he didn't want his
visit to G8 being disrupted or call off visits by foreign dignitaries to
London.

 Did government officials in Sheffield and possibly other cities heed the
warning that Blair chose to ignore?

 The terror threat to London was downgraded a month before the bombings. Why
did they lower the guard?

 As we reported on Thursday, original Associated Press and Israeli radio
reports stated that Binyamin Netanyahu, the former Israeli Prime Minister
received a warning before the first explosion that an attack was about to
take place. He was told to stay in his hotel room and not attend an economic
forum that was taking place in another hotel building adjacent to the site
of the first bombing. Scotlnd Yard passed on this warning to the Israeli
embassy in the knowledge that an attack was underway and yet for over an
hour the British people were told that the blasts were due to an electrical
fault.

The Israeli government is desperately scrambling to prevent more leaks.
Early on Friday they ordered all government officials to stop talking to
Western media about any aspect of the London bombings.

 Highly suspicious cirsumstances and contradictions continue to emerge in
the aftermath of the bombing.