Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - [Homestead] Pepper paste daubed in eye update

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Tvoivozhd <tvoivozd AT infionline.net>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: [Homestead] Pepper paste daubed in eye update
  • Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:09:19 -0700



Email this to a friend <http://info.mgnetwork.com/emailthisstory.cgi?url=http%3A//ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGB43NM4GZD.html&oaspagename=www.tbo.com/ap/story.htm&image=tbologo80x60.jpg>


Judge Declares Mistrial in Case Over Whether Police Abused California Logging Protesters

*By David Kravets* Associated Press Writer
Published: Sep 22, 2004

Advertisement


SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - A federal judge declared a mistrial Wednesday when a second jury deadlocked on the question of whether police went too far by swabbing pepper spray on the eyes of bound, nonviolent logging protesters in 1997.

U.S. District Judge Susan Illston ruled after jurors sent her a note asking whether all eight jurors must agree on the outcome. The jury had voted 6-2 in favor of the activists.

"I felt it was an unnecessary use of force given the circumstances," said juror Scott Michael. He said authorities could have cut the shackles off protesters to arrest them.

Under federal law, all jurors must agree on a verdict, unless both parties agree to accept a non-unanimous verdict. Attorneys for the protesters told the judge Wednesday afternoon they would agree to a non-unanimous verdict; attorneys for the Humboldt County Sheriff's Department said no.

The judge took the lawyers into her chambers to try to broker a settlement; it failed. Jurors tried once again to deliberate but maintained they were deadlocked.

An initial trial in 1998 on the same allegations also ended with a deadlocked jury, which voted 4-4.

One of the plaintiffs, Mike McCurdy, 29, said they wanted to pursue the case. "We believe the police crossed the line," he said.

Settlement talks ended when attorneys for the officers said they would not agree to the activists' demand that police stop using pepper spray on nonviolent protesters.

"It's like asking them not to use a gun when they respond to a robbery," attorney Bill Bragg told reporters.

Tony Serra, the activists' attorney, said the case was about trying to ban the use of pepper spray on those practicing civil disobedience. "They are unwilling to agree to that," he told reporters. "Therefore, I agree there will never be a resolution."

Just 10 minutes after the judge ordered jurors back again, they wrote another note saying they were "hopelessly deadlocked" and that further deliberations would be "pointless."

The judge then declared the mistrial.

The panel had hinted at trouble soon after deliberations began Tuesday, sending out a note saying: "Regretfully, there are jurors that are adamantly opposed and resolution does not seem likely."

The latest trial lasted two weeks. At issue is whether police use of the pepper spray was abusive and illegal on the protesters, who had shackled themselves together, or whether it was a legitimate law enforcement activity.

Serra told jurors officers treated protesters like "wild beasts."

Nancy Delaney, the attorney for the officers, said authorities did not wish to use power tools to unbind the protesters, fearing it could have "severed digits." She said they swabbed pepper spray to get them to unlock their shackles and be removed from private property.

AP-ES-09-22-04 194




  • [Homestead] Pepper paste daubed in eye update, Tvoivozhd, 09/22/2004

Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page