FreeTDS Development Group

[John Kendall <john AT capps.com>]

2016-04-23 13:04 GMT+01:00 Frediano Ziglio <freddy77 at gmail.com>:

> 2016-04-22 1:03 GMT+01:00 John Kendall <john at capps.com>: 
> 
> > Thu, 21 Apr 2016 11:04:54 +0100 Frediano Ziglio <freddy77 at gmail.com> 
> >
> >> 2016-04-21 8:00 GMT+01:00 John Kendall <john at capps.com>: 
> >>> On Oct 19, 2015 this patch was applied to ct.c: 
> >>>
> >>> "Fix affected rows after insert with prepared query" 
> >>>
> >>> This patch has the side-effect of a 'rows affected' being displayed for 
> >>> every 
> >>> select statement within a ASE stored procedure. For example, sp_help 
> >>> returns 
> >>> 136 extra 'rows affected' lines. See below. Backing out this patch 
> >>> stops this from 
> >>> happening. I only tested this on sp_help, but I figured that was 
> >>> enough. FYI, this
> >>> patch does not have this effect on MS SQL 2008's sp_help sproc. 
> >>>
> >>> John 
> >>>
> >>
> >> I'm not sure if this is a regression or an improvement. I have to 
> >> check what's the original CT-Library behaviour. 
> >>
> >> Frediano 
> >
> > Hi, Frediano. 
> >
> > I compiled sqsh against Sybase 16 libs and it does not return all those 
> > 'rows affected'
> > lines. I could be reading it wrong, but in the archives, it appears the 
> > patch applied was
> > not the one requested by David Nichols. 
> >
> 
> There was another patch that make the change the same. 
> 
> > https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/freetds/2015q4/029631.html
> >
> > Could we remove that patch? 
> >
> 
> I don't think so. But probably the patch fixed an issue and introduced a 
> problem 
> so we should find a solution. I think that Dave/Ondrei wanted to have the 
> row 
> number returned by a DONEINPROC in the case of a prepared statement. This 
> does not mean they want all DONEINPROC from the server. 
> 
> Basically
>  - before: no DONEINPROC
>  - after: all DONEINPROC
>  - wanted (you): one DONEINPROC (which one and how still to be defined) 
> Does this make sense?


Yes. 

As far as I can tell, it should only return the count for the last statement 
that could affect rows:

 
http://infocenter.sybase.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.sybase.infocenter.dc32300.1570/html/sqlug/X31520.htm

So, the last insert, delete or update, perhaps?

 

> > Thanks, 
> 
> > John 
> >
> >
> 
> I think this is the only no-build issue we had since the 1.0 RC. Not bad! 
> Frediano >
> 
> >>>
> >>> sqsh> sp_help Movetype 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> Name Owner Object_type 
> >>> -------------------------------- -------------------- 
> >>> ---------------------------------------- 
> >>> Movetype dbo user table 
> >>>
> >>> Column_name Type Length Pre 
> >>> ------------------------------------------------ ---------------- 
> >>> ------------------------ --- 
> >>> movetype char 2 NUL 
> >>> move_desc char 20 NUL 
> >>> move_revenue bit 1 NUL 
> >>>
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (0 rows affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (0 rows affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> Object has the following indexes 
> >>>
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> (1 row affected) 
> >>> ... etc 
> >>> <snip>