freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "James K. Lowden" <james.k.lowden AT icloud.com>
- To: freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [freetds] Output bufferring
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 11:31:32 -0400
On Thu, 14 Apr 2016 09:18:34 +0200
<jezekj AT centrum.cz> wrote:
> We have tried tracing on several levels and we have found that in
> FreeTDS trace log messages are written at every itteration. However
> in UnixODBC trace messages are shown when procedure finishes.
>
> [...] Is freeTDS bufferring messages on it's output (but after
> tracing log is written), or are these messages buffered in the
> UnixODBC?
If you look at the FreeTDS logging function, you'll see it opens and
closes the logfile each time a message is written. That ensures each
message is flushed to the disk, but it's very expensive in terms of
performance. You don't want to use TDSDUMP in production.
>From your description, it sounds like you're using log message to
monitor your application's data status. If so, I would counsel you
that that's a mistake. Better at the application level to capture the
statistics you need and flush them under application control (or, you
know, insert them in a table). Then you don't have to worry about the
vagaries of ODBC log buffering.
HTH.
--jkl
-
[freetds] Output bufferring,
jezekj, 04/14/2016
- Re: [freetds] Output bufferring, Frediano Ziglio, 04/15/2016
- Re: [freetds] Output bufferring, James K. Lowden, 04/15/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.