FreeTDS Development Group

[Frediano Ziglio <freddy77 AT gmail.com>]

That's why I applied it :-)

Frediano

2016-04-15 7:32 GMT+01:00  <matthew.green AT datamartcomputing.com>:
> I can't see why we shouldn't make this change. This syntax works with ASE 
> 16 and SQL Server 20114 and I'm not aware of any plans to remove support 
> for it in the future..... if nothing else there are too many programs out 
> there which use this syntax.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Matthew.
>
> April 15 2016 1:24 AM, "John Kendall" <john AT capps.com> wrote:
>>>> The defncopy app has one bit of SQL in it that uses an ANSI join. This 
>>>> makes it fail on pre-ASE
>>>> 12.0. To get it to work with my old servers i need to patch it each time 
>>>> I download the latest
>>>> FreeTDS.
>>>>
>>>> Since the SQL89 inner joins are still considered fine, I was wondering 
>>>> if this patch could be
>>>> applied. Then it will work for all servers out-of-the-box.
>>>
>>> Why did you remove the 'as' keyword?
>>>
>>> christos
>>
>> The 'as' keyword doesn't work with my older servers; and leaving out the 
>> 'as' keyword works with
>> current servers.
>>
>> John
>>
>>>> *** defncopy.c-orig Mon Feb 29 12:00:00 2016
>>>> --- defncopy.c Wed Apr 13 16:14:57 2016
>>>> ***************
>>>> *** 211,220 ****
>>>> static const char query[] = " select cast(c.text as text)"
>>>> #endif /* MicrosoftsDbLib */
>>>> ", number "
>>>> ! " from syscomments as c"
>>>> ! " join sysobjects as o"
>>>> ! " on o.id = c.id"
>>>> ! " where o.name = '%s'"
>>>> " and o.uid = user_id('%s')"
>>>> " and o.type not in ('U', 'S')" /* no user or system tables */
>>>> " order by c.number, c.colid"
>>>> --- 211,220 ----
>>>> static const char query[] = " select cast(c.text as text)"
>>>> #endif /* MicrosoftsDbLib */
>>>> ", number "
>>>> ! " from syscomments c,"
>>>> ! " sysobjects o"
>>>> ! " where o.id = c.id"
>>>> ! " and o.name = '%s'"
>>>> " and o.uid = user_id('%s')"
>>>> " and o.type not in ('U', 'S')" /* no user or system tables */
>>>> " order by c.number, c.colid"
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for considering this.
>>>>
>>>> John
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> FreeTDS mailing list
>> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
>> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds