FreeTDS Development Group

[Frediano Ziglio <freddy77 AT gmail.com>]

Well, as long you don't need to send table to server or get a table as a
parameter/column should work

Frediano

Il 16/Giu/2015 13:38, "Ray Rankins" <rrankins AT gothamconsulting.com> ha
scritto:
>
> I'm curious as to why it wouldn't work to query an in-memory table.
> I don't have an environment available at the moment to test it out, but
you run queries against an in-memory table just like a regular table using
standard SQL statements (SELECT, INSERT, UPDATE, DELETE).
> What goes on behind the scenes to manage an in-memory table structure
should be transparent to the client application.
>
> -Ray
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: FreeTDS [mailto:freetds-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of
> > Frediano Ziglio
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 16, 2015 3:55 AM
> > To: FreeTDS Development Group
> > Subject: Re: [freetds] FreeTDS and SQL 2014 In-Memory tables
> >
> > Il 16/Giu/2015 00:43, "Alistair Roberts" <
alistair.roberts AT ladbrokes.com.au>
> > ha scritto:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Has anyone tried FreeTDS and SQL 2014's in memory table option?
> > >
> > > Like to know if it's possible to get it to work or not.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > >
> > > Al
> > >
> >
> > Still not supported. Obviously it's possible to get it to work. The
point
> > is how quick you want and the involvement you want. As said is not
> > implemented so it has to be implemented.
> >
> > Frediano
> > _______________________________________________
> > FreeTDS mailing list
> > FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
>
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds