freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Ondrej Holecek <ondrej.holecek AT qoretechnologies.com>
- To: FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [freetds] affected rows after insert
- Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 10:49:35 +0200
Hi,
I have a problem obtaining number of affected rows while inserting.
The problem occurs when I pass the values by ct_param() call.
So, this command order works well:
ct_cmd_alloc()
ct_command(CS_LANG_CMD, "INSERT INTO test (number) VALUES(5)")
ct_send()
ct_result() // the result type is CS_CMD_DONE so I can call...
ct_res_info(CS_ROW_COUNT) // as expected 1 row affected
but when I call it like this, It skips CS_CMD_DONE, so I can't read
the affected rows number.
ct_cmd_alloc()
ct_command(CS_LANG_CMD, "INSERT INTO test (number) VALUES(@par1)")
ct_param("@par1", 1)
ct_send()
ct_result() // the result type is CS_END_RESULT
// can't do anything here :-(
The row is inserted in both cases correctly just in the second case I
can't read the number of affected rows.
I did some ctlib debugging and I created the patch which would fix
this behavior. However, I just changed the code blindly (based on the
debugging) not knowing what is the real purpose of the case.
in ct_result() function I changed the case _CS_RES_INIT:
case _CS_RES_INIT: /* commalindlnd had no result set */
if (tds->rows_affected > 0) {
*result_type = CS_CMD_DONE;
cmd->results_state = _CS_RES_INIT;
return CS_SUCCEED;
}
break;
now it seems with the patch it works correctly. But I have no idea if
it is really the correct way.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Ondrej
-
[freetds] affected rows after insert,
Ondrej Holecek, 06/02/2015
-
Re: [freetds] affected rows after insert,
Ondrej Holecek, 06/09/2015
- Re: [freetds] affected rows after insert, Frediano Ziglio, 06/11/2015
-
Re: [freetds] affected rows after insert,
Ondrej Holecek, 06/09/2015
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.