freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Ken Collins <ken AT metaskills.net>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] dbsetlversion + DBVERSION_100
- Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 09:29:00 -0500
Very interesting. I filed this ticket
<https://github.com/rails-sqlserver/tiny_tds/issues/62> on my Ruby's TinyTDS
page so I can look into our single use of dbsetlversion() vs dbsetversion()
which does support DBVERSION_100 now. I myself have never considered which is
more appropriate or tested if I should do both.
- Ken
On Nov 10, 2011, at 7:54 AM, LacaK wrote:
> Hi,
> can you please add into dblib.c support for Sybase 10 and above in
> dbsetlversion()
> See attached diff.
> TIA
> -Laco.
> --- dblib.c.ori Thu Aug 18 02:54:40 2011
> +++ dblib.c Thu Nov 10 13:45:56 2011
> @@ -936,6 +936,9 @@ dbsetlversion (LOGINREC * login, BYTE ve
> case DBVER60:
> login->tds_login->tds_version = 0x700;
> return SUCCEED;
> + case DBVERSION_100:
> + tds_set_version(login->tds_login, 5, 0);
> + return SUCCEED;
> case DBVERSION_71:
> tds_set_version(login->tds_login, 7, 1);
> return SUCCEED;
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
-
[freetds] dbsetlversion + DBVERSION_100,
LacaK, 11/10/2011
- Re: [freetds] dbsetlversion + DBVERSION_100, Ken Collins, 11/10/2011
-
Re: [freetds] dbsetlversion + DBVERSION_100,
James K. Lowden, 11/15/2011
-
Re: [freetds] dbsetlversion + DBVERSION_100,
LacaK, 11/16/2011
- Re: [freetds] dbsetlversion + DBVERSION_100, LacaK, 11/24/2011
- Re: [freetds] dbsetlversion + DBVERSION_100, James K. Lowden, 11/29/2011
-
Re: [freetds] dbsetlversion + DBVERSION_100,
LacaK, 11/16/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.