freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Brian Bruns <brian AT bruns.com>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type
- Date: Mon, 9 May 2011 18:33:20 -0400
I have complete faith.
I did a partial implementation of IBM's DRDA protocol (think TDS for
DB2). I had full access to three volumes of protocol documentation
(hundreds of pages), and I swear it was worse than figuring out TDS
from scratch.
Cheers,
Brian
2011/5/9 <jklowden AT schemamania.org>:
> On Mon, May 09, 2011 at 02:34:07PM -0400, Brian Bruns wrote:
>> Way to suck all the fun out of it! ;-)
>
> Yeah, a child could understand it now. Do we know any children, though?
>
> For example, I'm having a little trouble with the COLMETADATA flags on page
> 77. I think it has some bitfield unions, but I'm not sure from
> reading the spec who to interpret flags of 0x0a.
>
> 7.3 will be a significant undertaking.
>
> Regards,
>
> --jkl
> _______________________________________________
> FreeTDS mailing list
> FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
>
-
[freetds] notes on new DATE type,
jklowden, 05/06/2011
-
Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type,
Frediano Ziglio, 05/07/2011
-
Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type,
Christos Zoulas, 05/07/2011
-
Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type,
jklowden, 05/09/2011
-
Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type,
Brian Bruns, 05/09/2011
-
Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type,
jklowden, 05/09/2011
- Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type, Brian Bruns, 05/09/2011
-
Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type,
jklowden, 05/09/2011
-
Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type,
Brian Bruns, 05/09/2011
-
Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type,
jklowden, 05/09/2011
-
Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type,
Christos Zoulas, 05/07/2011
-
Re: [freetds] notes on new DATE type,
Frediano Ziglio, 05/07/2011
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.