FreeTDS Development Group

["James K. Lowden" <jklowden AT freetds.org>]

ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> 
> Honestly I prefer dynamic cause it does not require to relink tests
> every time. I also got  some problem compiling for windows (I don't
> remember perhaps was related to other issues). I  have a lot of script
> to help me to do some tasks (mostly testing and packaging), one cross 
> compile FreeTDS for Windows (either win32 and win64) and having big
> executable is a problem  (it takes quite a lot to move tests to my final
> test system)

Not relinking the tests every time is a good point.  I'll look for a way
to make RPATH work in the way I want.  

--jkl