freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
Re: [freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!)
- From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden AT freetds.org>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!)
- Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:17:39 -0500
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> I usually remove all them making compiler happy. But this
> case is something very particular... it's somethink like correcting 4+2x
> with 4+(2*x) in a mathematical equation.
I wrote to the GCC developers. No one objected to at least splitting up
the meaning of -Wparentheses, which might make it possible to avoid this
particular warning. I also asked it to be removed from -Wall. Opinion on
that question seems to be divided.
We'll see. No harm in asking.
--jkl
-
[freetds] going 64!,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/15/2007
-
Re: [freetds] going 64!,
James K. Lowden, 12/15/2007
-
Re: [freetds] going 64!,
Sebastien FLAESCH, 12/17/2007
-
[freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!),
James K. Lowden, 12/17/2007
- Re: [freetds] warnings, again, Sebastien FLAESCH, 12/18/2007
-
Re: [freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!),
Christos Zoulas, 12/18/2007
-
Re: [freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!),
James K. Lowden, 12/18/2007
- Re: [freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!), James K. Lowden, 12/18/2007
-
Re: [freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!),
Christos Zoulas, 12/18/2007
- Re: [freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!), ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 12/21/2007
- Re: [freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!), James K. Lowden, 12/21/2007
-
Re: [freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!),
James K. Lowden, 12/18/2007
-
[freetds] warnings, again (was: Re: going 64!),
James K. Lowden, 12/17/2007
-
Re: [freetds] going 64!,
Sebastien FLAESCH, 12/17/2007
-
Re: [freetds] going 64!,
James K. Lowden, 12/15/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.