freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
- To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc
- Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2007 10:11:40 +0100
>
> Replying to self. What a difference a day makes!
>
> James K. Lowden wrote:
> > $ ./bsqlodbc -S $S -U $U -P $P -i raiserror.sql
> > bsqlodbc: error -1: SQLExecute: SQL_ERROR: failed
> > bsqlodbc: error 50000: 42000: [FreeTDS][SQL Server]ouch
> >
> > Under what circumstances should raiserror cause SQLExecute
> to fail? Why
> > SQL_ERROR and not SQL_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO? The query:
> >
> > raiserror('ouch', 16,1) select 1 as 'one'
> >
> > returns and error message and a row. If SQLExecute returns
> SQL_ERROR,
> > should the application continue on and try SQLFetch??
>
> Latest testing shows SQLExecute no longer returns SQL_ERROR! A good
> thing, no question. What happens depends on the serverity
> level, which
> might be right. However, raiserror messages are still lost,
> see below.
>
> > Unfortunately, it looks like fisql and bsqldb both goof on
> this, too.
>
> bsqldb and fisql have both been fixed and process the above query
> correctly.
>
> I decided to torture bsqlodbc a little more with this script:
>
> raiserror('ouch of severity 0', 0,1) select 0 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 1', 1,1) select 1 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 2', 2,1) select 2 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 3', 3,1) select 3 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 4', 4,1) select 4 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 5', 5,1) select 5 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 6', 6,1) select 6 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 7', 7,1) select 7 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 8', 8,1) select 8 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 9', 9,1) select 9 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 10', 10,1) select 10 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 11', 11,1) select 11 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 12', 12,1) select 12 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 13', 13,1) select 13 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 14', 14,1) select 14 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 15', 15,1) select 15 as 'value'
> raiserror('ouch of severity 16', 16,1) select 16 as 'value'
>
> Note these are submitted as a single batch.
>
> As you can see, many of these messages are lost:
>
> $ make bsqlodbc && TDSDUMP=dump ./bsqlodbc -S $S -U $U -P $P -i
> raiserror.sql
> `bsqlodbc' is up to date.
> bsqlodbc: error 50000: 01000: [FreeTDS][SQL Server]ouch of severity 0
> SQLExecute: continuing...
> value
> ----------
> 0
> value
> ----------
> 1
> value
> ----------
> 2
> value
> ----------
> 3
> value
> ----------
> 4
> value
> ----------
> 5
> value
> ----------
> 6
> value
> ----------
> 7
> value
> ----------
> 8
> value
> ----------
> 9
> value
> ----------
> 10
> bsqlodbc: error -1: SQLFetch: SQL_ERROR: failed
> bsqlodbc: error 50000: 42000: [FreeTDS][SQL Server]ouch of severity 11
>
> >From that, it looks like SQLExecute gets an error, but when
> print_error_message tries to retrieve the messages (how many
> should there
> be?) it finds only one. Thereafter SQLFetch gets only
> SQL_SUCCESS until
> it comes across the RAISERROR with severity 11, when it gets
> SQL_ERROR.
> bsqlodbc then quits, which might not be the optimal choice....
>
> That's as far as I got.
>
You are using ODBC which is quite strange with this things. Try using
latest unixODBC and ODBC 3.
The problem came from SQLFetch return. If a data is fetched a
SQL_SUCCESS is returned and server error get read by SQLMoreResults
however this function has to return SQL_SUCCESS when we have another
recordset so DM lose the error. unixODBC (as my suggestion) read errors
even if SQLMoreResults returns SQL_SUCCESS (by default errors are readed
by unixODBC only if SQL_ERROR/SQL_SUCCESS_WITH_INFO). ODBC 3 support
recordset without rows but with error to separate errors during fetch
from single errors.
freddy77
-
[freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc,
James K. Lowden, 02/06/2007
-
Re: [freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc,
James K. Lowden, 02/07/2007
-
Re: [freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 02/07/2007
-
Re: [freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc,
James K. Lowden, 02/07/2007
-
Re: [freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 02/12/2007
- Re: [freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc, James K. Lowden, 02/12/2007
-
Re: [freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 02/12/2007
-
Re: [freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc,
James K. Lowden, 02/07/2007
-
Re: [freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 02/07/2007
-
Re: [freetds] new utility: bsqlodbc,
James K. Lowden, 02/07/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.