freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Re: [freetds] new dstr changes

From: jklowden AT schemamania.org
To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [freetds] new dstr changes
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:56:44 -0400

On Tue, Aug 29, 2006 at 05:26:36PM +0200, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
> I also noted that in code there is some code to use a static allocated
> buffer if possible (bcp if I reminds correctly), perhaps something like

I think we sometimes use DSTR structures where static allocations or
ordinary char* would suffice. I can't think of any reason to use a
"statically allocated" DSTR.

I see the advantage of distinguishing between byte-count and char-count.

--jkl

[freetds] new dstr changes, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 08/29/2006
- Re: [freetds] new dstr changes, jklowden, 08/29/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [freetds] new dstr changes, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 08/30/2006
  - Re: [freetds] new dstr changes, jklowden, 08/30/2006
    - Re: [freetds] new dstr changes, Christos Zoulas, 08/30/2006
- Re: [freetds] new dstr changes, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 08/30/2006