freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65

From: christos AT zoulas.com (Christos Zoulas)
To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65
Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2006 08:23:42 -0400

On Aug 25, 8:28am, Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com ("ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT")
wrote:
-- Subject: Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65

| Mmm.... why does fgetln.c do not nul terminate string. Your link point
| to a BSD licensed file, not compatible with LGPL. Also we free string so
| we would strdup the string.. I think I'll write a simpler realloc.

The spec (BSD4.4 stdio) says that the string is not NUL terminated.
As for the advertising clause, it can easily dissappear.

christos

[freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, Christos Zoulas, 08/24/2006
- Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, entropy, 08/24/2006
  - Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, Christos Zoulas, 08/24/2006
    - Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, entropy, 08/24/2006
      - Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, Christos Zoulas, 08/24/2006
    - Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, Frediano Ziglio, 08/24/2006
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 08/25/2006
  - Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, Christos Zoulas, 08/25/2006
- Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 08/25/2006
  - Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, Christos Zoulas, 08/25/2006
- Re: [freetds] tsql bug fixes that got lost between 0.64 and 0.65, ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 08/25/2006