Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

freetds - Re: [freetds] freebcp file limit

freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Li, Maggie (IT)" <Maggie.Li AT morganstanley.com>
  • To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [freetds] freebcp file limit
  • Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 13:48:36 -0500

I believe I used the 0.63 this time:

$Id: tds.h,v 1.192 2004/10/28 12:42:12 freddy77 Exp $
$Id: tds_sysdep_private.h,v 1.15 2004/10/28 12:42:12 freddy77 Exp $
$Id: sybdb.h,v 1.64.2.3 2004/12/15 09:45:30 freddy77 Exp $
$Id: sybfront.h,v 1.3 2004/10/28 12:42:12 freddy77 Exp $
$Id: dblib.h,v 1.21.2.2 2005/01/06 01:51:17 jklowden Exp $
$Id: tdsver.h.in,v 1.4 2002/11/21 16:53:43 freddy77 Exp $
$Id: tds_sysdep_public.h.in,v 1.8.2.1 2004/11/28 10:48:01 freddy77
Exp $
$Id: freebcp.h,v 1.9 2004/06/19 05:56:29 jklowden Exp $
$Id: freebcp.c,v 1.34.2.1 2005/02/03 09:39:14 freddy77 Exp $

Out of 11 million something rows, freebcp finished with no segmentation
fault, but only close to 6 million rows copied. Anyone can think of any
reason why?

Maggie

-----Original Message-----
From: freetds-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:freetds-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Robert Klemme
Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 12:08 PM
To: FreeTDS Development Group
Subject: Re: [freetds] freebcp file limit

2005/12/6, Lowden, James K <LowdenJK AT bernstein.com>:
> > From: Li, Maggie (IT)
> > Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2005 9:16 AM
> >
> > > Also, what does "ident $(command -v freebcp)" tell you?
> >
> > $Id: tds.h,v 1.167 2003/12/31 11:33:10 freddy77 Exp $
> ...
> > $Id: freebcp.c,v 1.28 2003/12/09 10:19:16 freddy77 Exp $
>
> I thought that might be the case.
>
> Upgrade. You're using 0.62, code that's two years old; we'll be
> releasing 0.64 soon. A lot happens in two years.

How true. That reminds me that I always wanted to ask about freetds
version number policy. When can we expect to see 1.0 (or even higher)?
On one hand I have the feeling that 0.63 is pretty much stable (at least
the bulk loader which is the only one we extensively tested so far) on
the other hand 0.63 seems to indicate quite a gap to 1.0 which irritates
me a bit...

Kind regards

robert
_______________________________________________
FreeTDS mailing list
FreeTDS AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/freetds
--------------------------------------------------------

NOTICE: If received in error, please destroy and notify sender. Sender does
not waive confidentiality or privilege, and use is prohibited.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page