FreeTDS Development Group

[Frediano Ziglio <freddyz77 AT tin.it>]

Il giorno mar, 02/08/2005 alle 14.03 -0500, Ben Gribaudo ha scritto:
> Hi,
> 
> I am working on verifying that FreeTDS works as it should on a Debian 
> 3.1 box. Would any of you be able to help me understand the output of 
> make check that's attached?
> 
> Lines 9-27, et all: Are the "error" outputs expected? Line 43 tells me 
> all tests pass but the lines with "error" make me wonder.

we test for overflow. conversion give error so is correct

> Lines 50-75: Line 75 says they pass but the server error messages above 
> that line make me wonder. Are those the expected output?

some are cleanup code, others are effective errors... Bill and me are
working on this issue. Probably it will be fixed in 0.64...

> Lines 90-110, 162-167, 432, et al: Should the library errors be occurring?

Yes

> Lines 125-147, et al: Are these cannot drop table complaints normal?

Yes, cleanup code

> Lines 151-159, et al: "CS_CMD_FAIL" concerns me. Is that expected?

ct_diagall tests if errors are reported, yes they are expected.

> Lines 359-365, 393-396: Again, are these normal or erroneous?

Yes, expected

> Lines 456-460: Why does this test pass if there is a problem? Or is that 
> considered not a failure but just a warning?
> 

Please contact Microsoft... they just change protocol and there is not
way to emulate old behavior, use dbrpc* function to get output
parameters.

freddy77