freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: "ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
- To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [freetds] On unicode strings support
- Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2004 16:39:19 +0200
> Well, thank you for clarifications. I would be satisfied with
> SQL_WVARCHAR
> support a la blobs - no convertions or special treatment,
> just -8 and -9
> data types codes and raw data. But OK, we have already
> resigned ourselves to
> loosing the unicode support.
>
Mmm... you you want to simplify works a lot there are some possibility:
- do not support *W functions
- do not support input/output parameters (placeholders in
SQLExecDirect/SQLExecute)
- support SQL_W(VAR)CHAR/SQL_C_WCHAR for SQLFetch/SQLBindCol
- keep WCHAR as they are and read as binary data
Using these restriction I don't think the change will reach 100 rows of
code... some if in token.c and some case conditions in odbc code (threat
WCHAR as binary...)
freddy77
-
[freetds] On unicode strings support,
Michael Kochetkov, 10/06/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [freetds] On unicode strings support,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 10/07/2004
- RE: [freetds] On unicode strings support, Michael Kochetkov, 10/07/2004
-
RE: [freetds] On unicode strings support,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 10/07/2004
- RE: [freetds] On unicode strings support, Michael Kochetkov, 10/07/2004
-
RE: [freetds] On unicode strings support,
Lowden, James K, 10/07/2004
- RE: [freetds] On unicode strings support, Michael Kochetkov, 10/07/2004
-
RE: [freetds] On unicode strings support,
ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT, 10/08/2004
- RE: [freetds] On unicode strings support, Michael Kochetkov, 10/08/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.