freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
Re: [Fwd: Re: [freetds] /usr/include/freetds/ and DBD-Sybase problem]
- From: Joshua Daniel Franklin <joshuadf AT u.washington.edu>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [freetds] /usr/include/freetds/ and DBD-Sybase problem]
- Date: Fri, 28 May 2004 22:27:32 -0700
Whoops, mailing list stripped the attachment. Here it is inline...
Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
Here is Dag's reply... it looks like there is a potential conflict with libgda... I'll see if I can come up with a patch to have DBD-Sybase's Makefile.PL check both /usr/include/ and /usr/include/freetds/ in the future.
On Fri, 28 May 2004, Joshua Daniel Franklin wrote:
>> ZIGLIO, Frediano, VF-IT wrote:
>
>>>>> > > > Here's the situation:
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > I've installed Dag's latest freetds rpms (freetds-0.62.3-1.1.el3.rpm
>>>>> > > > and freetds-devel-0.62.3-1.1.el3.rpm, dated 2004 May 17) on Red Hat
>
>> --snip--
>
>>>>> > > >
>>>>> > > > I found that the problem is that the freetds-devel header files are
>>>>> > > > installed to /usr/include/freetds/ instead of just /usr/include/
>>>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > <sigh>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Why can't RH leave things as they are?
Why do people assume things ? :)
>>> > Good question. We provide a .spec file with include files in
>>> > /usr/include...
>
>>
>> Just to clarify, these RPMs are not provided by Red Hat, but by Dag Wieers
>> (who packages a bunch of 3rd party stuff). For some reason his SPEC has:
>>
>> %define _includedir %{_prefix}/include/freetds
>>
>> <http://dag.wieers.com/packages/freetds/freetds.spec>
>>
>> If the freetds project doesn't see any reason for /usr/include/freetds/,
>> it sounds like Dag is the one to ask about what's going on, especially since
>> he lists freetds.org as the upstream provider.
Well, I certainly did that on purpose, the remaining question is why ;)
libgda requires freetds and seems to look for it in /usr/include/freetds.
And I think there was also a conflict between one of the header-files.
It seems also much cleaner having it in its own directory. Maybe we could
talk to the author of DBD-Sybase and have it look at /usr/include/freetds
so that eventually freetds can move its headers in its own(ed) directory.
Kind regards,
-- dag wieers, dag AT wieers.com, http://dag.wieers.com/ --
[Any errors in spelling, tact or fact are transmission errors]
-
[Fwd: Re: [freetds] /usr/include/freetds/ and DBD-Sybase problem],
Joshua Daniel Franklin, 05/28/2004
-
Re: [Fwd: Re: [freetds] /usr/include/freetds/ and DBD-Sybase problem],
Joshua Daniel Franklin, 05/29/2004
-
Re: [freetds] /usr/include/freetds/ and DBD-Sybase problem,
Joshua Daniel Franklin, 05/29/2004
- Re: [freetds] /usr/include/freetds/ and DBD-Sybase problem, Michael Peppler, 05/30/2004
-
Re: [freetds] /usr/include/freetds/ and DBD-Sybase problem,
Joshua Daniel Franklin, 05/29/2004
-
Re: [Fwd: Re: [freetds] /usr/include/freetds/ and DBD-Sybase problem],
Joshua Daniel Franklin, 05/29/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.