freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
Re: [freetds] dbrpcsend fails (works now, BUT THERE IS MORE)
- From: "James K. Lowden" <jklowden AT schemamania.org>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] dbrpcsend fails (works now, BUT THERE IS MORE)
- Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2004 22:46:10 -0500
On Thu, 25 Mar 2004, "Polyanovskyi, Sasha" <sasha.polyanovskyi AT oa.com.au>
wrote:
> I've changed the code to the suggested way, now neither case :-)
> (actualy my procedures are a bit different in a number of params that
> get passed)
>
> Suggested way:
> while (dbresults() != NO_MORE_ROWS)
> {
> process columns...;
> process return status...;
> process results;
> }
You have certainly found a bug. The suggested way should work, and won't,
because our rpc implementation is out of spec. It partly works, but it
clearly doesn't really work. I'm going to try to fix that.
Thanks for the additional test cases. If you want to speed things along,
make the rpc.c unit test more comprehensive.
Regards,
--jkl
-
RE: [freetds] dbrpcsend fails (works now, BUT THERE IS MORE),
Polyanovskyi, Sasha, 03/23/2004
- Re: [freetds] dbrpcsend fails (works now, BUT THERE IS MORE), James K. Lowden, 03/23/2004
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
-
RE: [freetds] dbrpcsend fails (works now, BUT THERE IS MORE),
Polyanovskyi, Sasha, 03/23/2004
- Re: [freetds] dbrpcsend fails (works now, BUT THERE IS MORE), James K. Lowden, 03/24/2004
-
RE: [freetds] dbrpcsend fails (works now, BUT THERE IS MORE),
Polyanovskyi, Sasha, 03/24/2004
- Re: [freetds] dbrpcsend fails (works now, BUT THERE IS MORE), James K. Lowden, 03/24/2004
- Re: [freetds] dbrpcsend fails (works now, BUT THERE IS MORE), James K. Lowden, 03/25/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.