freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: FreeTDS Development Group

List archive

RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag

From: "ZIGLIO Frediano" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>
To: "FreeTDS Development Group" <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 14:51:58 +0100

>
> It's a very interesting option! However I don't know all
> disavantage it can take. Anyone know a way to "flush" socket
> correctly? By the way... attached a patch to enable TCP_NODELAY.
>
http://www.unixguide.net/network/socketfaq/2.11.shtml
http://freebooks.by.ru/view/SambaIn24h/ch23.htm

Perhaps it's really a good idea... however I still don't understand why
there isn't a flush call for socket :(

freddy77

RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag , (continued)
- RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, ZIGLIO Frediano, 11/20/2003
- RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, ZIGLIO Frediano, 11/24/2003
  - RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, moshe doron, 11/24/2003
- RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, ZIGLIO Frediano, 11/24/2003
  - RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, moshe doron, 11/24/2003
- RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, Lowden, James K, 11/24/2003
- RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, ZIGLIO Frediano, 11/25/2003
- RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, ZIGLIO Frediano, 11/25/2003
- RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, Lowden, James K, 11/25/2003
  - RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, Craig Jackson, 11/26/2003
    - RE: [freetds] Freetds\sql server lag, Frediano Ziglio, 11/28/2003