FreeTDS Development Group

["ZIGLIO Frediano" <Frediano.Ziglio AT vodafone.com>]

> 
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:46:25 -0400, "Steve Murphree" wrote:
> > 
> > Diffing this thing out against the current tree would be a pretty 
> > dificult thing to do, but if anyone is interested, I will diff it 
> > against the 0.61 release and make a nice little (BIG) patch.
> > 
> > Also, if given CVS tree access, I would integrate it into 
> the current 
> > tree. A big diff splatted against the tree would be too hard to 
> > follow. I would incrementally integrate the code bit by bit.  So if 
> > the authors are interested?
> 
> Steve, 
> 
> That sounds like excellent work.  Don't bother to generate a 
> patch against 0.61; it would be better to integrate your work 
> into CVS.  I'm inclined to grant you CVS access, but ODBC is 
> largely Frediano's work, and I'm not qualified to judge the 
> goodness of your work or whether your ideas dovetail with 
> his.  Freddy's on vacation until late July, so your timing 
> could be better. :-}
> 
> OTOH, the code will be very stable in the meanwhile.  Why 
> don't you pull a current copy of CVS, integrate your changes, 
> and construct a patch from that (against CVS)?  Post it to 
> source forge, where Frediano (and others) will find it and 
> look it over.  That will give us a better idea of your style 
> and direction, and provide a forum to thrash out any disagreements. 
> When everyone's happy, I can turn on the commit bit.  
> 
> How's that by you?  
> 

I'm back from holiday. I had a very good holiday!!

I'll look your patch and integrate it...
I just look a bit but I don't understand the reason to separate Sybase
and MSSQL.. I'm against this..

freddy77