freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
Re: ODBC unimplemented functions again (was Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support)
- From: Peter Harvey <pharvey AT codebydesign.com>
- To: FreeTDS Development Group <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: ODBC unimplemented functions again (was Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support)
- Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 15:03:17 -0800
As we discussed in this forum a few weeks ago, some driver managers
rely exclusively (and erroneously) on link-time information about
what functions are available in the driver. IIRC, iODBC falls in
this category and unixODBC does not. Since iODBC has not, as far as
I know, been ported to VMS, and unixODBC does not have the problem,
the main advantage to limiting the export list doesn't seem overly
compelling. Are there other advantages?
I am all for the standard whenever it makes sense and sometimes - even when it does not (i.e. just because it can be relied upon to perform a certian way). My 2 cents.
Peter
-
Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support,
James K. Lowden, 03/01/2003
-
Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support,
Craig A. Berry, 03/01/2003
- Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support, James K. Lowden, 03/01/2003
-
Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support,
Frediano Ziglio, 03/02/2003
-
ODBC unimplemented functions again (was Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support),
Craig A. Berry, 03/02/2003
- Re: ODBC unimplemented functions again (was Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support), Peter Harvey, 03/02/2003
-
ODBC unimplemented functions again (was Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support),
Craig A. Berry, 03/02/2003
-
Message not available
- Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support, James K. Lowden, 03/14/2003
-
Re: [freetds] [PATCH] VMS build support,
Craig A. Berry, 03/01/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.