freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: Brian Bruns <camber AT ais.org>
- To: freetds mailing list <freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [freetds] des_ecb_encrypt naming
- Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2002 19:23:09 -0500 (EST)
I think a better question is why we have any non-static functions not
named with the tds_ prefix. This has been a long standing tradition for
that very reason.
Brian
On Tue, 17 Dec 2002, Mark J. Lilback wrote:
> Can we rename des_ecb_encrypt to be something else?
>
> Mac OS X includes a function with this name in libcrytpo, and because
> of weak leaking, the FreeTDS version could be called when the
> executable meant to call the system version.
>
> I think there is a way to bypass this with compile flags, but it
> seems best to me to avoid having symbols with the same name as system
> functions.
>
>
>
-
[freetds] des_ecb_encrypt naming,
Mark J. Lilback, 12/17/2002
- Re: [freetds] des_ecb_encrypt naming, Brian Bruns, 12/17/2002
-
Re: [freetds] des_ecb_encrypt naming,
James K. Lowden, 12/17/2002
-
Re: [freetds] des_ecb_encrypt naming,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/18/2002
- Re: [freetds] des_ecb_encrypt naming, Steve Langasek, 12/18/2002
-
Re: [freetds] des_ecb_encrypt naming,
Frediano Ziglio, 12/18/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.