freetds AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: FreeTDS Development Group
List archive
- From: James K. Lowden <jklowden AT speakeasy.org>
- To: TDS Development Group <freetds AT franklin.oit.unc.edu>
- Subject: MAXPATHLEN in tds/config.c
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 18:49:40 -0400
All,
Argh, we need the help of an autoconf magician.
My system compiles config.c just fine, and doesn't need an explicit
include of sys/param.h to find MAXPATHLEN. But some systems do? I have a
report from someone else whose compiler has a different opinion,
apparently:
> cvs update
> make distclean
> ./configure
> make
>
> [...]
> gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -g -O2
> -DTDS50 -Wp,-MD,.deps/config.pp -c -fPIC -DPIC config.c -o
> .libs/config.lo
> config.c: In function `tds_get_config':
> config.c:91: `MAXPATHLEN' undeclared (first use in this function)
> config.c:91: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> config.c:91: for each function it appears in.)
Following those instructions, I got:
gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../include -I../../include -g -O2
-DTDS50 -c config.c
In file included from config.c:42:
/usr/include/netinet/in.h:170: warning: `INADDR_NONE' redefined
../../include/config.h:13: warning: this is the location of the previous
definition
How does one go about isolating the culprit?
Many thanks,
--jkl
-
MAXPATHLEN in tds/config.c,
James K . Lowden, 05/20/2002
- <Possible follow-up(s)>
- Re: MAXPATHLEN in tds/config.c, Brian Bruns, 05/29/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.